Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Is Diablo 3 really need 10 years to complete?

views
     
takkicom
post May 28 2012, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(Luftwacko @ May 25 2012, 07:11 PM)
U do know that they got other projects in hand during the past decade right? They can't possibly focus all their effort on just Diablo 3.

Other projects they did between Diablo 2 & 3:
- Warcraft III
- World of Warcraft
- Starcraft 2
- Counting money
*
do you guys know how a team running in a cg company?
team by team usually this team is war3
that team is star2
then wont be clashing each other project
cause it might be very big problem if they end up mixing the modeling animation
and effect

meaning concentration of file source

like their company cg and in game is separated so this project maximum only take 1~2year enough too much time

This post has been edited by takkicom: May 28 2012, 03:41 PM
takkicom
post May 28 2012, 03:43 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(gseed87 @ May 26 2012, 04:49 AM)
Torch light 2 is only 1/3 of its price. Even it lack of something, but it worth the price for sure. Diablo 3 is an incomplete game, yet selling for that price. Not to mention the expansion will cost u again. I rather take the money for game like guild war 2. and diablo i will play my friend account tongue.gif
*
agree even the story also not longer than torchlight did
6 skill torchlight has more choices
takkicom
post May 28 2012, 04:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
at least it 1/3 price that diablo 3 did

takkicom
post May 28 2012, 05:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
422 posts

Joined: Sep 2008
QUOTE(gaeria84 @ May 28 2012, 04:22 PM)
DLC. Wait for it.  rclxms.gif
*
DLC? when they server lost half of the people they always did

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0159sec    0.44    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 1st December 2025 - 04:33 AM