Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 PC Gamer's review, score 90, worth it

views
     
nightshade_nova
post May 24 2012, 02:08 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
443 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3rd from Sol



QUOTE
There’s not nearly enough variety in either the type or effectiveness of what you find, and the significance of stats is fussily abstract: +93 strength has no effect on a Monk’s punching damage, because that’s not her ‘primary attribute’.


Dafuq. blink.gif
I know game designers have been praising the int-agi-str system left and right, even if some of them disliked the simplification of the skills.
And this guy just nonchalantly write something very...childish.
By his logic, more str means more punching power? doh.gif

Pc gamer review is crap.
Get something more reliable like eurogamer or gameinformer.

My own opinion, diablo 3 is great cos it manages to retain whats important in the diablo franchise.
nightshade_nova
post May 24 2012, 07:33 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
443 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
From: 3rd from Sol



QUOTE(radkliler @ May 24 2012, 07:19 AM)
Isn't that supposed to be kind of the point?

If you had more muscle, you would be able to hit harder, punch harder and all that jazz.
*
Thats not the point. sweat.gif
I think we can all agree that if you include argument about 'video game logic' on your review, you are a bad reviewer.



 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.2203sec    0.46    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 01:01 PM