3DMark05 : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2066467

Lowyat.NET 3DMark TOP 20 [MID-RANGE], 12 Pipelines Maximum - updated Jun 15
|
|
Jun 13 2006, 08:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 15 2006, 03:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
Again my X1800GTO
3DMark06 : http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=344676 Clocked at 661MHz/711MHz Hehehehehehe....... This post has been edited by Najmods: Jun 15 2006, 03:37 AM |
|
|
Jun 17 2006, 03:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(nakata101 @ Jun 17 2006, 02:13 PM) Goldfries, please update for me.... Your 3DMark06 use 1152x864 instead of 1280x10243dmark2k1 3dmark2k3 3dmark2k5 3dmark2k6 AMD Athlon64 3200+E6@2.7ghz -Biostar TFORSE 6100 - 939 -Inno3D Geforce 7600GST 256MB DDR3 1.4ns @ 800/1600 -Kingston Value DDR400 256MBx2 -Maxtor SATA 80GB -LG DVD Writer -Atrix T500 PWS |
|
|
Jun 24 2006, 02:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
Why is my X1800GTO 3Dmark05 isnt on the list? Heres the ORB
http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2066467 |
|
|
Jun 25 2006, 06:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
|
|
|
Jul 15 2006, 01:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 16 2006, 01:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(king99 @ Jul 13 2006, 09:21 PM) 3DMark01SE : nil Your 3DMark05 doesnt too far off from my X1800GTO score. But surely beats my GTO in 3DMark06 since the higher number of pixel shader processor and Fetch4 support3DMark03 : nil 3DMark05 : » http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=2111388 System: AMD Athlon 64 3000+ OC to 2Ghz Abit KN8 mainboard 1GB kingston value GECUBE 1900gt Maxtor 80GB SATA HDD AcBel TruePower 450 Watts PSU If you say that X1900GT is 12 pipe card so a X1600 is a 4 pipe card, surely it beats all other 4 pipe card out there since it have three times the pixel shader processor like you do, and thats totally unfair |
|
|
Jul 23 2006, 05:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
^ yep thats right, 3DM01SE is very CPU dependant. I only get 25000marks with my rig
|
|
|
Aug 12 2006, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,211 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: Konohana |
QUOTE(sniperwolf @ Aug 10 2006, 10:59 PM) So where should I post my result at? Just now try benchmarking for the stability of the cards and get some scores which no idea bad or good also Thats on SLI, no wonder its so high. My GTO also gets that score when overclocked at 639MHz core and 774MHz memory3dmark05= ngam ngam 8.6k score [attachmentid=126826] |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.2157sec
0.22
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 11:51 AM |