RON 95 CAUSED DAMAGES, Rumours has been spreading around.
|
|
 May 21 2012, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
1,024 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Kajang  
|
QUOTE(jAkUn @ May 21 2012, 05:31 PM) any Proton/Perodua owners experiencing such problems? no problem. still working after 6 years. of course in terms of performance ron95 a bit inferior compared to ron97. but definitely using ron95 wont harm my p2 engine.or does it only happens to Jap/Korean/Conti cars?  |
|
|
May 21 2012, 11:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
1,024 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Kajang
|
QUOTE(WhitE LighteR @ May 21 2012, 11:06 PM) yes.. i lazy type so long ma yep..turbo already have high pressure. so the compression ratio must be lower compared to na engine. thats why if want to bot na engine..need to use low compression piston(if the boost is high).  actually abt the cfe is not really accurate. turbo car has less compression ratio coz you pack more air in the same amount of space. so you cant compress it too much without it giving you other issues...  |
|
|
May 22 2012, 10:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
1,024 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Kajang
|
QUOTE(WhitE LighteR @ May 21 2012, 11:35 PM) very no make sense wei... yep..usually under 0.8 no need to use low comp piston. Added on May 21, 2012, 11:36 pm if u dont boost that high dun need to change low com piston. thts y ppl wit BOT feel more power. u got more air + high com NA piston Added on May 22, 2012, 10:36 am QUOTE(djhenry91 @ May 22 2012, 04:09 AM) my cousin husband....honda city Vtec CVT wan..pakai ron 95 still running strong..urs car really ada prob liao got one story heard from my distance family member..use shell ron95 his civic kong. but use petronas ron95 ok. so if using shell, he must use v-power.  This post has been edited by theanswer: May 22 2012, 10:36 AM |
| Change to: |  0.0144sec
 0.52
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 30th November 2025 - 07:03 PM |
Quote