QUOTE(led_zep_freak @ Jun 1 2012, 02:48 PM)
And are you saying Rodgers is not a winner? His team had 12 wins, 11 draws and 15 loses. 11th place in the Premier League. And to achieve that while trying to play football the right way despite having limited resources?
If you're basing your judgement on his thin CV, just look at Rafa and Mourinho. Had Valencia and Porto based their appointment on CVs, would they achieve domestic and European success then?
Every great manager has to start somewhere, at least with Rodgers there are evidence that suggest he isn't merely just a flavour of the month. No, he wasn't my first, second or third choice but heck, I'm excited to see what he could bring to the table.
I'm not saying he's not a winner.
I'm merely saying he may not have the track record to manage such a big club like Liverpool.
Granted, he did well with Swansea with limited resources. but that was over 2 season (which, by no means, considered a "track record")
Also remembered he didn't excatly do well with Watford and Reading.
And to now manager a club as big as Liverpool, is i think, asking too much of him.
Rafa and Mourinho were different.
They were Champions League winner as well as domestic league winners with Valencia and Porto respectively.
Managing in the championship or even managing a very respectable 11th place in the EPL is one thing, guiding your team to win the domestic league and the Champions League is another completely different thing all together.
Yes. Every manager has to start from somewhere.
But that dosen't have to be with such a big club.
He could have gone to Aston Villa or some other mid table clubs and build reputation from there.
Managing at Liverpool is like throwing a small boy who just learnt how to swim into the wide open ocean.
Further with so many choices around, why Rodgers?
Why go for someone untested and unproven (2 sucessful season is hardly considered as a good track record more so that he did not win any throphies)?