Still no indication on the pricing yet. But rumor has it, it's around 130k. I did find things funny though in the brochure. Combined fuel consumption is 8.2L/100km vs 7.1L/100km on the 508. Same engine, same gearbox, weights similar to the 508, but higher FC. 508's FC has been over-exaggerated I guess.

Too bad the 2.0L model is still running on dinosaur 4-speeder gearbox, else it'd be a better choice in terms of reliability

Thanks bro for the compliment. Actually, the table is a one time effort .... from then it's just adding more and more info to the table as newer models are introduced. There are also some data that are still missing and would appreciate anyone to provide and verify the data for everyone to see.

http://www.kensomuse.com/2012/05/breaking-...page-views.html

Am happy to have achieved a new milestone in the development of the site.

i sat inside 408...its nice....

This is everyone would like to know. Compare between Jetta and Peugeot 408 turbo

---

Added on May 20, 2012, 12:13 pmThe price I just ask .$128k for 1.6 turbo and $138k for 2.0

Back looks sad. Droopy tail lights, similar to sylphy

RM128k for the 2.0? REALRY?!

Around rm115k for 2.0

Peugeot 408 is a pretty nice car, only the rear design is a letdown to the rather handsome exterior design.

Check out the night where the 408 is launched! http://www.simonhar.com/2012/05/peugeot-40...ty-or-nice.html

Oh thx man, corrected the figure

The SA told me 2.0 using same gb as 407, i believed because i saw AL4 sticker on the gear knob.

I see, they should have used the right sticker then. Not sure how is the service n maintenance cost

can't wait to test drive it , wonders is there any test drive unit @ Naza Federal Highway there ...

contrary to popular belief, the 408 is NOT a 308 with a boot. both cars have different wheel base. FYI there is a 308 Sedan (sharing the same wheelbase with the 308 hatch) but its not in our market.

If you're using the turbo as the benchmark, you'll find the 2.0 to be severely underpowered. If compared against other 2.0 NA, I find the engine to have sufficient pulling power. This issue is most obvious at 0-60kph but once you hit cruising speed, mid to high range power is as good. The only thing I didn't like about the 2.0 is the super light steering which is great in city drives but not so good if you're speeding on winding roads since road feedback is poor and the accurate steering means you have to constantly pay attention to your car's angle. For an old man like me who no longer have the need for speed, I think the 2.0 is a good buy for the asking price. Most important is the fact that you'll NEVER have depollution problems with it.

refer to 408 and 508 brochure, even they use same engine (1.6 thp), why the fuel consumption for 408 is higher compare to 508?
408 is (8.2l/100km) vs 508 (7.1l/100km).
I thought since 508 is bigger car, so the FC should be higher than 408. what happen? 

The car is very nice and the price is also very good. Some issues I have with it are the glove compartment is really small (meant to keep gloves only I think) and no volume control etc buttons on the steering wheel. Nice car with good leg, head and boot space though.

---

Added on June 4, 2012, 8:49 pm
It's going to be very interesting to see how Naza slots this model with price and engine choice. It is of smaller cabin size than the 408.

You mean 308t is launching?
How reliable of your source? still can see anything from paultan.org yet also...
I hope this is a good news