2.0Turbo?

I thougth 1.6T and 2.0NA?

Got 2.0T how much? That would be in the range of A4 performance jor 

There's really not much of a difference in FC between the turbo and NA. It all depends how you drive. However for 16k more you get quite a lot on the turbo model, stretching from additional safety features to exciting drive! Think no more,go for the turbo,you'll not regrett!

Your case is same as mine, tight budget to go for 408T. But I didn't regret buying the 408NA either 

To your query about the FC for 2.0, for 10% hway + 90% town driving, I get around 10.7 - 10.9 l/100km. For 90% hway, the best FC observed is 7.9 l/100km. Like SKYJack said, it mostly depends on how you drive. But then again, if you're stuck in traffic jam, 1.6 turbo will consume less fuel for sure.

If budget is one of your concern, and you dont really care abt those spec that missing in 2.0NA. Don't worry abt the FC. Its actually not that much dif between these 2 variants.

Somemore 2.0NA engine is more reliable compare to 16T.

---

Added on August 7, 2012, 9:26 pmSo brothers here mostly from KL?? Any from JB like me?

i think the fuel consumption difference is not the major factor. its all in the way you drive. i am getting around 9.6L and mostly town driving, u know the jam on LDP etc. softer on the pedal, u'll save. but to me the most important factor in choosing the NA or T is the drive comfort and your driving pattern. more relaxed/comfort and quiet feel opt for NA but if you like the thrills... then T is yout choice. I sacrificed the thrills just for the comfort the car provides.