Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 RAM - Timing vs Clock Speed, Which is more important?

views
     
gsan
post Dec 30 2005, 09:24 AM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

since you're going to do with little overclocking, i believe that lower fsb with 2225 is better than a bit higher fsb with 3xx8.

example,

210 @ 2-2-2-5 vs 220 @ 3-x-x-8 if i assume that you're only overclock a bit.
gsan
post Dec 30 2005, 09:50 AM

Electrical RF Engineer
*******
Senior Member
2,471 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(x800 @ Dec 30 2005, 09:29 AM)
if im not mistaken,the ram's higher clock speed will benefit much more on P4 platforms than tighter timings.there was an article on this that i read, that showed quite a significant difference in SiSoft memory benchmark.but that article was published before the days of the A64..

for me, i can see that higher ram clock speed is better that tighter timings because my rams are not capable of 2-2-2-5 at higher clocks.IIRC, my rams can take 2-2-2-5 only till DDR410.i did a superpi comparison with the rams at DDR410/2-2-2-5  with DDR500/2.5-4-3-5, and the second setting gave better results (cpu speed was kept the same).
*
yeah, you're right but he stated to do little oc.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0169sec    0.73    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 01:35 PM