Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Cindy's Photography, Updated with new PP picture

views
     
TSsenyii
post May 7 2012, 09:27 PM, updated 14y ago

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
Been to Kota Kinabalu, Sabah recently....Some of the pic are rather blur...been sometime i did not pLAY WITH MY DSLR...C&C are welcome..

Guys please comment which picture is better...I play around with exposure and also the saturation and hue....

KK1)

user posted image
user posted image

KK2) user posted image

KK3) user posted image

KK4) user posted image

KK5) user posted image

KK6) user posted image

This post has been edited by senyii: May 17 2012, 12:26 PM
rubrubrub
post May 7 2012, 09:36 PM

senor
******
Senior Member
1,793 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: UC Berkeley


i have no idea why but when i 1st saw all your pics, lack of exposure comes to mind.
kilawe
post May 7 2012, 09:36 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
45 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
wohh realy nice photo and place..
TSsenyii
post May 7 2012, 11:09 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
QUOTE(rubrubrub @ May 7 2012, 09:36 PM)
i have no idea why but when i 1st saw all your pics, lack of exposure comes to mind.
*
i think its because of the mist or maybe when I edit it i put too much of recovery or blacks..
JLVisual
post May 8 2012, 12:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
I think it's pretty nice taken and balanced rclxms.gif
patienceGNR
post May 8 2012, 03:25 AM

♥ Ride All Day ♥
*******
Senior Member
2,058 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Today: 9:03 AM



Honestly speaking here, I don't know what subject(s) it is in each photo. Try to shoot underexposed rather than overexposed if you are shooting RAW.

fun_feng
post May 8 2012, 01:26 PM

One Cat to Rule Them ALL
*******
Senior Member
2,289 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Stairway to Heaven
#1 in landscape is that usually the dynamic range is so great there is no camera that can successfully capture the whole beauty of it. That is why we always see overblown sky in landscape.
Landscape photogs uses tons of filters like GND, RGND, polarizer, ND etc...
If you are going to digitally do this, I would suggest you underexpose when you take the photo(to get the cloud details) then digitally brighten and apply graduated filter
TSsenyii
post May 9 2012, 12:34 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
QUOTE(patienceGNR @ May 8 2012, 03:25 AM)
Honestly speaking here, I don't know what subject(s) it is in each photo. Try to shoot underexposed rather than overexposed if you are shooting RAW.
*
i did shoot underexposed...maybe my PP skill is realy poor..need more practice
QUOTE(fun_feng @ May 8 2012, 01:26 PM)
#1 in landscape is that usually the dynamic range is so great there is no  camera that can successfully capture the whole beauty of it. That is why  we always see overblown sky in landscape.
Landscape photogs uses tons of filters like GND, RGND, polarizer, ND etc...
If you are going to digitally do this, I would suggest you underexpose when you take the photo(to get the cloud details) then digitally brighten and apply graduated filter
*
will remember this and try again next time..
stsh90
post May 16 2012, 08:59 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
824 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: KL


The landscape images (i.e. #1,#2,#4) would look much lovelier if the skies weren't over-exposed. fun_feng has pointed out exactly what you could do to improve that, though I'd like to add that perhaps you could try to post-process the pictures into HDR images (take three shots: under-, normal, and over-expose; then edit in Adobe Photoshop/Photomatix).

Have fun trying smile.gif
TSsenyii
post May 16 2012, 09:14 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
QUOTE(stsh90 @ May 16 2012, 08:59 PM)
The landscape images (i.e. #1,#2,#4) would look much lovelier if the skies weren't over-exposed. fun_feng has pointed out exactly what you could do to improve that, though I'd like to add that perhaps you could try to post-process the pictures into HDR images (take three shots: under-, normal, and over-expose; then edit in Adobe Photoshop/Photomatix).

Have fun trying smile.gif
*
Later I'll try to re-edit the pic again..

As for HDR I dun hv the software n tried searching the web but still failed to do HDR..
hoechou
post May 17 2012, 05:58 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


for HDR, try google for photomatix.. i juz downloaded a FOC one~
TSsenyii
post May 17 2012, 06:29 PM

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
QUOTE(hoechou @ May 17 2012, 05:58 PM)
for HDR, try google for photomatix.. i juz downloaded a FOC one~
*
i install before but not sure how it works..when i try to edit my picture come out with stiking blue color..lol
etsuko
post May 18 2012, 11:05 AM

Spaced out person
Group Icon
Elite
4,210 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Malaysia


KK2 is best in composition. Brightness looks a little dark and is the sky really that blue?
TSsenyii
post May 18 2012, 11:17 AM

On my way
****
Junior Member
519 posts

Joined: Apr 2008
QUOTE(etsuko @ May 18 2012, 11:05 AM)
KK2 is best in composition. Brightness looks a little dark and is the sky really that blue?
*
not that blue..i increase the hue to blue....i will upload other set later...will try to practice my pp skill...

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0176sec    0.68    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 01:20 PM