Guys please comment which picture is better...I play around with exposure and also the saturation and hue....
KK1)


KK2)

KK3)

KK4)
KK5)
KK6)

This post has been edited by senyii: May 17 2012, 12:26 PM
Cindy's Photography, Updated with new PP picture
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:27 PM, updated 14y ago
Show posts by this member only | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
Been to Kota Kinabalu, Sabah recently....Some of the pic are rather blur...been sometime i did not pLAY WITH MY DSLR...C&C are welcome..
Guys please comment which picture is better...I play around with exposure and also the saturation and hue.... KK1) ![]() ![]() KK2) ![]() KK3) ![]() KK4) KK5) KK6) ![]() This post has been edited by senyii: May 17 2012, 12:26 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,793 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: UC Berkeley |
i have no idea why but when i 1st saw all your pics, lack of exposure comes to mind.
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:36 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#3
|
![]()
Junior Member
45 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
wohh realy nice photo and place..
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 11:09 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 12:32 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#5
|
![]()
Junior Member
10 posts Joined: Mar 2012 |
I think it's pretty nice taken and balanced
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 03:25 AM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,058 posts Joined: Mar 2011 From: Today: 9:03 AM |
Honestly speaking here, I don't know what subject(s) it is in each photo. Try to shoot underexposed rather than overexposed if you are shooting RAW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 8 2012, 01:26 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,289 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Stairway to Heaven |
#1 in landscape is that usually the dynamic range is so great there is no camera that can successfully capture the whole beauty of it. That is why we always see overblown sky in landscape.
Landscape photogs uses tons of filters like GND, RGND, polarizer, ND etc... If you are going to digitally do this, I would suggest you underexpose when you take the photo(to get the cloud details) then digitally brighten and apply graduated filter |
|
|
May 9 2012, 12:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(patienceGNR @ May 8 2012, 03:25 AM) Honestly speaking here, I don't know what subject(s) it is in each photo. Try to shoot underexposed rather than overexposed if you are shooting RAW. i did shoot underexposed...maybe my PP skill is realy poor..need more practiceQUOTE(fun_feng @ May 8 2012, 01:26 PM) #1 in landscape is that usually the dynamic range is so great there is no camera that can successfully capture the whole beauty of it. That is why we always see overblown sky in landscape. will remember this and try again next time..Landscape photogs uses tons of filters like GND, RGND, polarizer, ND etc... If you are going to digitally do this, I would suggest you underexpose when you take the photo(to get the cloud details) then digitally brighten and apply graduated filter |
|
|
May 16 2012, 08:59 PM
Show posts by this member only | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
824 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: KL |
The landscape images (i.e. #1,#2,#4) would look much lovelier if the skies weren't over-exposed. fun_feng has pointed out exactly what you could do to improve that, though I'd like to add that perhaps you could try to post-process the pictures into HDR images (take three shots: under-, normal, and over-expose; then edit in Adobe Photoshop/Photomatix).
Have fun trying |
|
|
May 16 2012, 09:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
QUOTE(stsh90 @ May 16 2012, 08:59 PM) The landscape images (i.e. #1,#2,#4) would look much lovelier if the skies weren't over-exposed. fun_feng has pointed out exactly what you could do to improve that, though I'd like to add that perhaps you could try to post-process the pictures into HDR images (take three shots: under-, normal, and over-expose; then edit in Adobe Photoshop/Photomatix). Later I'll try to re-edit the pic again..Have fun trying As for HDR I dun hv the software n tried searching the web but still failed to do HDR.. |
|
|
May 17 2012, 05:58 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
18 posts Joined: Sep 2005 |
for HDR, try google for photomatix.. i juz downloaded a FOC one~
|
|
|
May 17 2012, 06:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
|
|
May 18 2012, 11:05 AM
|
|
Elite
4,210 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Malaysia |
KK2 is best in composition. Brightness looks a little dark and is the sky really that blue?
|
|
|
May 18 2012, 11:17 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
519 posts Joined: Apr 2008 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0176sec
0.68
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 23rd December 2025 - 01:20 PM |