I never regard Brunei as success story.
They depended too much on oil.
Singapore vs Brunei - 50 Years Economy Progress
Singapore vs Brunei - 50 Years Economy Progress
|
|
May 5 2012, 07:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
I never regard Brunei as success story.
They depended too much on oil. |
|
|
May 5 2012, 08:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:00 PM) Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore. |
|
|
May 5 2012, 08:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
|
|
|
May 5 2012, 08:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(empyreal @ May 5 2012, 08:12 PM) it doesnt matter. what matters is the concentration of people and urbanisation. the more people in a city, the more vibrant its economy, and this vibrancy is what leads to national economic growth. that's why underpopulated brunei lags behind singapore. even in the 1960s, brunei was better only in terms of 'living standards' - having more space, less congestion, etc. likewise, malaysia too is underpopulated, even discounting the rural areas, kl is small. That does not explain why gap between Malaysia and South Korea became much pronounced in 1980's.if you look at it in a macro view, why would kl and penang (or even new york, london or any large cities today) exist, since none of the cities have any mining, drilling or forestry industries within it? |
|
|
May 5 2012, 08:26 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
Still, all is not lost for us.
We must capitalise on what we have, such as Scomi monorail, locally made solutions for transit, Proton etc. |
|
|
May 5 2012, 08:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
QUOTE(hazremi @ May 5 2012, 08:27 PM) depend on current situation, malaysia need to liberalize its industry. open total control for foreigners. Similarly, government must develop a policy that ensures the continued demand for higher tech equipments, through comprehensive development policy, such as public transit.currently, the govt has already liberalized some industry but not all Hehe, if at least 4 to 5 cities in Malaysia has metro, our local company such as Scomi will have enough demand and at the same time, boosting its portfolio, so that Scomi will be even more marketable. |
|
|
May 5 2012, 09:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
Brunei has no future, when it runs out of oil.
|
|
|
Sep 18 2012, 12:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
VIP
3,028 posts Joined: Feb 2005 From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah |
SG had adequate infrastructure in 1960's, but you have to remember it is only a city and it had serious issue on how to sustain its economy when the British decided pull its military base east of Suez canal (which includes SG).
SG had nothing to produce, almost nothing. Infact MY developed Port Swettenham (now Port Klang) to sidestep SG. |
| Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0145sec
0.25
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 05:48 PM |