Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Singapore vs Brunei - 50 Years Economy Progress

views
     
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 07:57 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
I never regard Brunei as success story.

They depended too much on oil.
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:02 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:00 PM)
singaporean cakap, singaporean dianak tirikan gomen, foreigner dibelai manja....
*
Singapore managed to grow its economy that can rival HK, Malaysia despite having no natural resources and no large market.

HK even during British days, has mainland China as economy support, but not Singapore.
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:13 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(PVCpipe @ May 5 2012, 08:03 PM)
their economy mainly driven by foreign investment rite?
*
Same like any country.

However, look at SIA, Creative, Capitaland, Singtel...all regional players hmm.gif
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:14 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(empyreal @ May 5 2012, 08:12 PM)
it doesnt matter. what matters is the concentration of people and urbanisation. the more people in a city, the more vibrant its economy, and this vibrancy is what leads to national economic growth. that's why underpopulated brunei lags behind singapore. even in the 1960s, brunei was better only in terms of 'living standards' - having more space, less congestion, etc. likewise, malaysia too is underpopulated, even discounting the rural areas, kl is small.

if you look at it in a macro view, why would kl and penang (or even new york, london or any large cities today) exist, since none of the cities have any mining, drilling or forestry industries within it?
*
That does not explain why gap between Malaysia and South Korea became much pronounced in 1980's.
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:26 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
Still, all is not lost for us.

We must capitalise on what we have, such as Scomi monorail, locally made solutions for transit, Proton etc.


Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 08:30 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
QUOTE(hazremi @ May 5 2012, 08:27 PM)
depend on current situation, malaysia need to liberalize its industry. open total control for foreigners.

currently, the govt has already liberalized some industry but not all
*
Similarly, government must develop a policy that ensures the continued demand for higher tech equipments, through comprehensive development policy, such as public transit.

Hehe, if at least 4 to 5 cities in Malaysia has metro, our local company such as Scomi will have enough demand and at the same time, boosting its portfolio, so that Scomi will be even more marketable.
Kampung2005
post May 5 2012, 09:57 PM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
Brunei has no future, when it runs out of oil.
Kampung2005
post Sep 18 2012, 12:20 AM

Proudly Kampungite, will always be one.
Group Icon
VIP
3,028 posts

Joined: Feb 2005
From: 梅田,大阪 //Sabah
SG had adequate infrastructure in 1960's, but you have to remember it is only a city and it had serious issue on how to sustain its economy when the British decided pull its military base east of Suez canal (which includes SG).

SG had nothing to produce, almost nothing. Infact MY developed Port Swettenham (now Port Klang) to sidestep SG.

Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0145sec    0.25    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 05:48 PM