QUOTE(viper88 @ Apr 24 2014, 10:55 AM)
If developer not confirm or haven't get approval ... they will adv as "proposed" to play safe. The covered walkway link from KL East to GITT and the Quarza Mall both are confirm coz its
in the KL East 10 yrs master development plan... u can go to check it out to verify urself.
The buyer can sue if they feel being cheated or misled false advertisement by developers ..
Huh? I don't need to check anything at the sales office. I have seen enough BS about "proposed" links to highway, links to MRT (and the MRT itself not even confirmed by the govt), proposed schools, proposed Pavilion #5, etc. I am just making a big deal out of this because clearly you are promoting this project heavily. Nothing wrong with that except I'm pointing out possible disappointment from would-be purchaser who is promised this and that. I will only buy this type of moon promise if DBKL / Rapid / MPAJ gave a confirmation that the developer has indeed obtained such approval to construct the link.
How many times we have been to sales office and the SA said this and that will be built and when pressed further about the approval process & land aquisition (yes, that darn glorified linkway will pass thru other people's land, shocker), the SA simply keep quiet. It's not in the script for the SA.
Once again, how many cases that the developer being sued purely on brochures. AFAIK, the only binding documents are either SPA, deed of mutual convenant and a few others. If those fantastic colorful brochures can become court evidence, maybe everyone should also use their iPhones to take photo of the miniature masterplan showing the linkway then show it to the judge. Oh don't forget to pay legal fees.