I have been thinking for a couple of months whether I should convert to be a full time PhD student.
Pros of being a full timer
- More time to spend on your PhD research
- More time to write papers as well
- You can get it done faster
Cons
- No income unless you apply for a scholarship
Pros of being a part timer
- Steady income
Cons
- Less time to spend on research
- Distraction
- Work is your main priority
- It will take a longer time to finish the PhD
For me, I think income and time are the deciding factors.
I have an easy job (not stressful), pay is not bad (not that high, not that low), but of course there are still work to do. And work becomes my main responsibility instead of the PhD research. As at now, both of my supervisors find my proposal framework to be acceptable. So, I just need to spend more time writing on the literature review and the methodology at the moment.
I have already decided to resign but I haven't tendered yet. My main aim is to be an academic/researcher and I want to spend more time on my PhD research and to spend more time on writing research papers and to get it publish. If I continue to work, I don't think I have the time to write such papers and the place I'm working doesn't seem to be encouraging research activities. I don't think this is the type of institution that I want to continue working in.
My worry now is that whether I could get the MyBrain scholarship because I'm from the social science field and the chances are lower compared to the science and technology field. The requirement is that you have to resign from your full time job before you are qualified to apply for it.
So, what do you think, guys?
This post has been edited by Blofeld: May 5 2012, 11:35 AM
Humanities Full time vs Part time PhD, Pros and Cons
May 5 2012, 11:29 AM, updated 14y ago
Quote
0.0268sec
0.53
5 queries
GZIP Disabled