seriously? camera again?>???

which imbecil buys a phone because of its camera......
really..

a major point of a smartphone was never its camera.

Noone disagrees having a decent camera, which all smartphones have passed this stage, its the point where expectations dont meet reality.

Not everyone has a DSLR, and when ur posting shots from a phone, clearly you have no intentions to post it up a billboard or a magazine.

Am I clear?

A smartphone is different from a cameraphone.

If one requires such, there are always benefits and costs. If someone can make a smartphone with a camera as good as a cameraphone, wouldnt it defeat the sole purpose of it instead?

"Capturing the moments" as in posting it on facebook? if it is at that rate, my sgs2 would look the same as my nexus as it is to my hox in picture quality as compared to my friends ip4s. What will make a difference is comparing it to my hasselblad.

Granted that camera do need improvements as it climbs up the evolutionary ladder.

Why do I need a quad core???
Thats because I do alot of PDF viewing, editing as well as powerpoints editing on the go which was the core purpose of a smartphone, which almost none of you guys do so rather than playing games and facebooking, no pun intended.

Theres a term called specialty in each category.

clearly you have never done powerpoint editing with a dual core, be it on a nexus, or a sgs2.
I used it, and I dont have time for it to jerk around, when time is money to me.

Noone knows about the camera quality on the s3. At least none of us here.

If you are doing those "eating out" shots, a normal one will do, what are you gonna do with it is clearly not for professional usage.

On the plus side= Ive seen more people using their dslr or compact cameras taking food photos than just a smartphone. prove me wrong in that essence.

These phones are tools to work.

Even with O2 6 years ago, i used it for excel spreadsheet light editing. nowadays, youngsters really fuk up the real value of a smartphone.