QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 23 2012, 06:23 PM)
imho, all ppl buy watches based on design.
some just try to justify their expensive choices by saying its got fancy movement etc
Rolex Submariner, looks exactly the same for the past goddamn how many years. What DESIGN? Its ANCIENT. The design is practically the same.
Movement? Fancy? Its just date and time, or plain time. No chrono, no moonphase, NOTHING.
QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 24 2012, 07:18 PM)
thats the point.
EVERY watch is based on FASHION regardless if it costs RM100 or RM1million.
That's NOT the point. Rolex Submariner today looks exactly the same since the 70s. In the 70s people had Afros and bell bottoms. Is designs from the 70s era fashionable? You don't see people wearing bell bottoms and having Afros all over, but people still buy the Rolex Submariner today. So its NOT fashion.
Every watch based on fashion = false.
Why do you want to buy a Gucci or Burberry watch is beyond me. We clearly know that Gucci and Burberry didn't make the watch, they just license their name to some factory to produce it. Likewise the same with Mont Blanc, who owns factories that make writing instruments, not watches.
The truth is, people don't need a watch these days, you have a mobile phone with you. Watch is not necessary. Then why wear a watch? Ask yourself that question first before thinking about buying a watch.
Added on June 23, 2012, 12:12 am
QUOTE(Inscrutable @ May 10 2012, 12:33 PM)
ML is good but I think the price is Overrated. If I were you I rather get a Quartz Longin. Oris entry lv RM3k you can find already also the longin.
Or you are interested in MontBlanc Quartz? around RM3,000 from a watch dealer here, Quartz movement.http://www.montblanc.com/en/Flash/Default....tar-date-105913
Can PM me to chat about watches too~
Rather buy a Tissot automatic than a MontBlanc Quartz for RM3,000.
Quartz..what's the point.This post has been edited by Jason: Jun 23 2012, 12:14 AM