nope, its standard to run lean on manufacturer default for safety. This is will change accordingly during the vvt changes n turbo spooling.
Even any standard will run on lean for reliability. As manufacturer, need to take into account on balancing everything.
Erm, standard 1.6 neo 112hp, on crank, yup, there always be 110hp+- on crank/engine. But still using fixed ratio on cvt simulation can result diff result. Better wait for mt tranny, then can get accurate one.
But the thing thats if been informed, ecu n tcu will limit the torque automatically so that not exceeding the limit. And the hp n torque on engine as specify by prtn is on engine, where it is diff from dyno what we seen, it just a set of engine in engine test room. Even there are tolerence +-, thats why its limit at 205, even if some unit can make more torque, but still in safe parameter which vt3 is able to take 220nm.
So, diff method for dyno, produce diff result. Even the mt will have same power n torque figure, it just more flexible coz u r in control of everything.
Please, no matter how good we are, there are diff between pwr n drive terrain engineer(those who develop from ground up to finish product) and those who are just fiddling the the finish product. So, shud respect both, especially those who develop the product. Everything is calculated precisely.
Tq tq, another community service, now I can sleep in peace, I hope someone can do another dyno test so we can compare.