lower arm mesti either crack or patah terus.

i had a similar accident with my perodua a few years back. hit the divider at 70km/h, trying to avoid a car doing a sudden u-turn.
lower arm abis, 1 rim total lost..tayar kena ganti, bumper kena repair. 

u confirm with DSZ the SA kena sack is it? if not then ur just talking rubbish...

as we don't hv real story from the driver, it can be anything, only that sa can confirm

what is 'kemuk'? 'remuk' or 'kemek' i know la...

wow... I'm impressed with the information technology (internet).

I think the world is full of prejudice people. People that prefer to pre-judge or making assumptions (false/negative).

1. someone post a picture of an incident to the car, the moment later, a flock of a troll came and giving out so many negative assumptions withou even knowing anything about it. We hear statements like "proton is using crappy parts", "proton is still a piece of crap", "proton is shit", "proton parts never aligned due to political/cronies vendors" and etc...

2. Surprisingly these people will never care about the truth. Their intention is to bash blindly. They never seek the truth.

3. Next, when we have explanation about the accident that cause the problem, suddenly these people dissapear. Did they retract back their statements ? Never !... because they don't care about the truth.

4. Some people don't even want to believe to the explanation. They prefer to stick with their false, unproven and unsubstantiate assumptions rather than accepting the explanation given. Nobody ask them to believe the explanation but why they still keep their negative assumption ?

5. Failure to bash with the incident, some people bring back stories about tax, protection, government etc etc....to continue bashing the company. They don't even care with the hard fact about automotive industry. They don't even care to know how other manufacturers did in their industy. They don't even care to know what other government did to their automotive industry. To these people, the fact is not important but continue bashing and parroting false statements are their topmost priority.

6. some people will use statment like.... "my friend works in a vendor company for proton....", "my friend working in proton said...." "my granma's friend said..." and some people will agree to them without even asking the evidence.

7. I've heard people said, this part is from vendor A and another part is from vendor B and suddenly they don't fit and have to return back and everything is rushed to meet the dateline.... and another person seems to believe this without even asking the proof. Just enough with a statement like "my friend works here and he told me...." and that statement is taken as gospel truth. Funny enough, that person linked that nice story with politics/cronyism which don't even true...
and then.... the story continue to spread throughout the globe and giving negative perception towards a company/person/organization etc. And it started with just an assumption.

Today when I visited the Proton dealer, I mentioned in passing to the SA that I heard many people abuse the car til rosak.

He automatically demo to me by pressing the left button panel, and he was pressing pretty hard until the center console and HU also move. It is actually PRETTY HARD to press the buttons into the dashboard, hard like you need kuasa lembu to do it, and you have to do it deliberately.

I laugh and say you also know that news ka? He tell me he also dunno how the idiot manage to break the panel.

did I say my statements are facts ? did I giving any factual information ? or you can't comprehend simple text that tells a scenario ?

Did I insult Mat79 ? if you don't understand my simple text, please don't put words into my mouth. Since when Mat79 said, my friend said....

Mat79 is giving explanation with details technical facts. That is called facts. You can even google the facts and it is true.

Please learn to differentiate between technical stataments and gossips. Mat79 gives technical stataments (facts) but some people tell gossip stories.

vios? fast? I see

Just back from second test drive session. Just to confirm the first round result.

This is the pecking order:

NVH = Inspira 2.0 > Elantra 1.8 > Preve 1.6
Performance = Inspira 2.0 >>> Preve 1.6 ≈ Elantra 1.8
Response = Inspira 2.0 > Elantra 1.8 > Preve 1.6
Handling = Inspira 2.0 >> Preve 1.6 ≈ Elantra 1.8

Overall = Inspira >> all

I'm not trolling. This is my stand. Tq.