It's sad in Malaysia, they treat Manual transmission as a shitty cheap option. Here worship Auto/CVT more. Blurgh...

Honestly, I found Waja Campro driving experience is more composed than Preve. Waja Campro may have under-powered power plant, but the turbocharged Preve doesn't really live up to it's hype.

The acceleration feels sluggish. And put it in manual mode, it feels more sluggish.. What the hell?

Paddle shifter in Preve is just a marketing gimmick. I didn't feel engaged when browsing through the gears. It feels very artificial, lack of sense and what not. Cruising also feels somewhat 'empty'.

For me, it's just a bigger, more premium Saga FLX with paddle shifter for showcase and turbo-charged engine for marketing gimmick.

Just back from second test drive session. Just to confirm the first round result.

This is the pecking order:

NVH = Inspira 2.0 > Elantra 1.8 > Preve 1.6
Performance = Inspira 2.0 >>> Preve 1.6 ≈ Elantra 1.8
Response = Inspira 2.0 > Elantra 1.8 > Preve 1.6
Handling = Inspira 2.0 >> Preve 1.6 ≈ Elantra 1.8

Overall = Inspira >> all

I'm not trolling. This is my stand. Tq.

FTFY

Seriously why would you want to bring THAT up? I think my comparison is fair. Since Preve claims to have 2.0-like power with 1.6 engine.

I find Preve's CFE no match for Inspira's 4B11. They should stop the hype. I drove it, and I don't believe it.

I guess. But real world experience kinda difference with spec-sheet figures.

Comparing with Peugeot 308 1.6 THP. Fair enough?

I guess.

Noted. Will go and have a test drive for Polo 1.2 TSI.