Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ♠ ♠ ♠Proton Prevé V4♠ ♠ ♠, ► Official Discussions for Proton Prevé

views
     
kcng
post Apr 21 2012, 11:56 PM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(matmoto5125 @ Apr 21 2012, 11:50 PM)
Seriously why would you want to bring THAT up? I think my comparison is fair. Since Preve claims to have 2.0-like power with 1.6 engine.

I find Preve's CFE no match for Inspira's 4B11. They should stop the hype. I drove it, and I don't believe it.
*
that is because u expected mind blowing acceleration
smile.gif
kcng
post Apr 22 2012, 12:05 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(matmoto5125 @ Apr 22 2012, 12:00 AM)
I guess. But real world experience kinda difference with spec-sheet figures. sad.gif
Comparing with Peugeot 308 1.6 THP. Fair enough? unsure.gif
*
nope....

308 THP engine is much more refined and much more powerful than this pervert....
not to mentioned the mapping of the ECU is bias towards a more sportier drive...

try thinking polo 1.2 TSI acceleration and u will get the picture...
smile.gif

on the other hand, this pervert is map towards what u call effortless acceleration... where u wont feel the engine strain to accelerate the car from standstill or under a heavy load
smile.gif

to expect a mind blowing acceleration will just disappoint u to the max
smile.gif
kcng
post Apr 22 2012, 12:11 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(arthur88 @ Apr 22 2012, 12:06 AM)
do u necessarily need to use that word?
*
QUOTE(dadurtyz @ Apr 22 2012, 12:08 AM)
u trolling or what? come'on
*
doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif doh.gif

learn to look at the lighter side of life
smile.gif
kcng
post Apr 22 2012, 12:19 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(matmoto5125 @ Apr 22 2012, 12:13 AM)
Noted. Will go and have a test drive for Polo 1.2 TSI.
*
its a case in point... dont take it as a direct comparison

polo has the super efficient DSG gearbox to channel all the available power from the engine to the wheel as compared to the combo found on the preve
smile.gif

scrap the polo 1.2 TSI (sorry), i think it will be better for u to test drive a 2.0 NA car...
that is the type of acceleration expected...

after all, this 1.6 CFE is supposed to be like a 2.0 NA car
smile.gif

in my opinion, this preve has marginally slower/faster acceleration than a FD2 (my personal butt-dyno)
forget the 0-100 km/h on paper... paper values means nothing more than marketing
smile.gif
kcng
post Apr 22 2012, 12:26 AM

~ Or@ng Giler ~
********
Senior Member
17,566 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: FFK Division - Klang



QUOTE(sp3d2 @ Apr 22 2012, 12:24 AM)
hp for this preve cfe is matched with 1.8 NA engine only not 2.0 NA.
*
HP for brag
torque win races

heard of that above?
smile.gif

Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0467sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 07:24 AM