QUOTE(ken7908 @ May 13 2012, 12:25 AM)
I just done driving a Camry 2.0g from klang to kuchai lama both ways via npe. All I can comment would be Camry is much sluggish compared with k5, handling is totally disastrous if cruising more than 70KM/h over curvy or corners over the npe stretch.
Noise level is pretty similar with k5, maybe a little lesser due to the 16" rim. Perhaps the passenger would feel a bit more comfort, but for me the driver feels a bit more jumpy over the uneven road.
One thing I really surprised is the FC, it was showing average of 12.1km/liter which close to 8.3liter/100km! That I would say wow. Other than that, it was a poor driving experience compared with k5. Imho, accord 2.0 would also best Camry anytime.
I tested the FC on the Optima on highway drives a number of times. At 110kmph the instant FC is 9.1L/100km while at 160kmph, its 10.2L/100km. So it actually makes more economic sense to drive at 160kmph as the FC difference is only about 1 liter every 100km. So if ure driving from KL to Ipoh, driving at 160kmph would only consume RM3.50 more compared to driving at 110kmph but ull reach faster thus your extra 'expenditure' is nullified.Noise level is pretty similar with k5, maybe a little lesser due to the 16" rim. Perhaps the passenger would feel a bit more comfort, but for me the driver feels a bit more jumpy over the uneven road.
One thing I really surprised is the FC, it was showing average of 12.1km/liter which close to 8.3liter/100km! That I would say wow. Other than that, it was a poor driving experience compared with k5. Imho, accord 2.0 would also best Camry anytime.
May 14 2012, 09:27 AM
Quote
0.0486sec
0.20
7 queries
GZIP Disabled