Samsung Galaxy S III Thread V1, Available May 29th
|
|
 May 4 2012, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
 
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW  
|
QUOTE(vostroxe @ May 4 2012, 07:25 PM) sorry..forgot about custom rom..really new to android..newbies like me prefer official support than custom rom..i dont even know how to customize the rom. that why samsung, not too care about the official update, they release unlocked bootloader, they know many developer will help develop, they just release the source code, and the base.  customize your rom, you feel satisfied for sure. |
|
|
|
|
|
May 4 2012, 07:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
QUOTE(waveweaver @ May 4 2012, 07:27 PM) 100% agreed with you. Tons of post in this thread is only about grumbling and whining. not to blame them 100%, the strategy of keeping secret from samsung really get everyone thinking they will release new super phone like they never do before, they also thought this 3rd time surely samsung can get it to their head about releasing nice design phone.if you look at htc, their phone isnt change much of the design, but still somehow you could get that feeling of attractiveness to the phone. somehow you dont feel that with the samsung official phone. even the nexus got much more attractiveness. This post has been edited by silentser: May 4 2012, 07:36 PM |
|
|
May 4 2012, 08:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 07:45 PM) It is not ugly. Just that some users think Samsung didn't do a better job coming with a better design. Those who said it is ugly needs to have their eyes check. I won't say is outstandingly beautiful or grand but definitely ugly is wrong word right on unker ben.And most of those bashing it are sadly from HTC camp. I am also quite disappointed that Samsung did not come up with a better looking phone but as I said earlier on, design is not the most important criteria for me Can some one tell me how "ugly" is the S III vs the HTC one X ? [attachmentid=2824321] And now another round of bashing about its build material being plasticky and not aluminium or whatever metal ?? These guys has not even seen and hold the phone in their hands and already condemning it. Sad case of obvious stupidity I'd say, talking with their mouth in their ass. If any of you are offended , I do not wish to apologize. I mean what I said Comments on it when you see and feel the phone yourself - if you think it sucks, just don't buy it. Buy others that pleases you. I only make comments when I physically purchased the phone and to hell with whatever other people say or web reviewers said. If it satisfy me, good ; if it doesn't I will just quickly sell it off front i would say i like, just the back... dont know what to say. since S1,S2 they keep saying its cheap cheap plastic cheap, but still both of it is a kick ass phone. instead of saying samsung need to learn, why dont u get that is what their strategy... there is reason for it. i think because it is lighter Added on May 4, 2012, 8:02 pm QUOTE(violette @ May 4 2012, 07:56 PM) wonder why people buy phones n do drop test. better give it to me. dengan tangan terbuka menerimanya. build quality test. how else they want to prove the claim of gorrila glass and such This post has been edited by silentser: May 4 2012, 08:02 PM |
|
|
May 4 2012, 08:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
QUOTE(acci @ May 4 2012, 08:04 PM) thanks for the link.. they should have a battery comparison test though. The S3 seems like a battery hungry device dont think any reviewer get any demo phone yet to get the hands on experience, mybe next week? *finger cross*Added on May 4, 2012, 8:14 pm QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 08:04 PM) And now we have users now "praising" SGS II plasticky is better when they have not even see/touch this SGS III. Some times I wonder where they get this feeling ?? Just throwing rubbish comments without any basis IMO, motorola design is the 1st Samsung is never well known for its design - for that try Sony Ericsson follow by HTC  , then sony, then htcbut motorola hardware quality is... questionable  , my defy got so many hardware problem for the first batch, earpiece, and now lcd.... and high risk in custom rom, This post has been edited by silentser: May 4 2012, 08:14 PM |
|
|
May 4 2012, 10:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
QUOTE(benny888 @ May 4 2012, 10:38 PM) At least the back black cover looks so much nicer, smooth and glossy unlike than the image posted ( which was yucky) i got plans to pimp up the white back cover |
|
|
May 4 2012, 11:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
i think samsung is not targeting S2 user with S3, they are targeting the S1, and other mid end phone. for me from S1, S3 fulfill every S1 user desire, LED notification, more core, more storage. bigger screen.
so most bashing come from S2 user... |
|
|
May 4 2012, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
|
Senior Member
3,177 posts Joined: Sep 2006 From: subway FTW
|
QUOTE(XeactorZ @ May 4 2012, 11:41 PM) lol close the thread already then who create v2 ? i vote TS dont open up new thread just yet, it will just filled with bashing and negativity.. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0436sec
 0.28
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 07:19 PM |
Quote