QUOTE(raisedbywolves @ Mar 14 2014, 10:45 PM)
Because when you're consuming only whole foods, you are full before you can even exceed your daily caloric needs.
For example, my 2pm lunch is oven-baked thyme and lemon chicken slices with steamed broccoli and eggs. I usually prepare a proper dinner plate sized portion, but I usually only finish half, and finish the other half at about 5pm.
A plate of rice with veggies and steamed chicken would amount to say, about 600-700 calories. Rice is the processed food culprit here.
A plate of my lunch which has a lot of broccoli could only amount to half of that. Even if you want to exceed, you would be too full to go on.
When you eat a lot nutrient and fiber dense food, you get full, before even consuming that much calories. Of course if you are counting calories, it's not a bad thing either but I just feel it's too 'subjective' and misleading because some people think if they eat a cookie which has 300 calories, they can cancel it out later at the treadmill by hitting the 300 calorie point on the machine. It just doesn't work that way.
Full is subjective, period. Sure, whole food are more satiate but that doesn't mean when you are full, you can't gain weight or lose weight or maintain your weight. Why? Because you are in a state of clueless in term of how much calorie you eaten. For example, my 2pm lunch is oven-baked thyme and lemon chicken slices with steamed broccoli and eggs. I usually prepare a proper dinner plate sized portion, but I usually only finish half, and finish the other half at about 5pm.
A plate of rice with veggies and steamed chicken would amount to say, about 600-700 calories. Rice is the processed food culprit here.
A plate of my lunch which has a lot of broccoli could only amount to half of that. Even if you want to exceed, you would be too full to go on.
When you eat a lot nutrient and fiber dense food, you get full, before even consuming that much calories. Of course if you are counting calories, it's not a bad thing either but I just feel it's too 'subjective' and misleading because some people think if they eat a cookie which has 300 calories, they can cancel it out later at the treadmill by hitting the 300 calorie point on the machine. It just doesn't work that way.
Just imagine, your body needs 2000kcal to maintain weight. Somehow, within a full day of eating of whole clean food, your body only managed to consume 1500kcal. That's 500kcal deficit and repeat that everyday, at the end of the week, you'll 'magically' lose 1 pound for no apparent reason (you didn't know because you didn't notice that you are eating at a deficit each day).
In other word, sure eating healthy whole food is good but if you have a goal to either lose weight or gain weight, calories in and out must be in a controlled condition, not by just depending on your body capability to consume food.
Mar 14 2014, 11:10 PM

Quote
0.0609sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled