Apr 13 2012, 09:19 PM
QUOTE(lowpro @ Apr 13 2012, 12:48 PM)
fuel consumption could be more in the standard campro than the cps. for my manual cps, i used to get 7.1L/100km. after upgrading to the r3 exhaust and a few other go-faster bits, my fc is now at 7.2L/100km.
not sure about older versions but my 1 and half year old car has absolutely no problems at all. mileage is at about 18,000km now.
It should be the other way around. Cps engine is honestly the product from crap company such as proton. I own proton gen 2 cps and i must say that was a good car minus all the the problems. But the engine is powerful enough and driving on highway really feels great.not sure about older versions but my 1 and half year old car has absolutely no problems at all. mileage is at about 18,000km now.
Cps is actually a complete version of campro. You can see how this engine being tune crazily by r3 and they put it in satria neo.
Anyway for fuel consumption as other people above suggest, drive within moderate rpm and it should be good. If u must take proton then get proton gen 2 cps. But u need to face all the problems.
Quote
0.0161sec
0.51
6 queries
GZIP Disabled