» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
QUOTE(mat79 @ Apr 7 2012, 07:10 PM)
off topic, also sharing thought. After reading all the reviews on preve by media, i think that i notice, all saying the iafm+ cvt variant really loud in term of engine sound. If u follow closely, they mentioned it loud when pedal to metal@at 5k rpm. Not only the engine sound but cvt whining also contribute to that. The question is, do u need to pedal to metal to overtake driving cvt or even driving uphill or driving up to speed 140-160kmh? The answer that i gain from my source, is no. Malaysian still new with cvt gbox even its already been around long time ago. Driving a cvt is not the same as driving twin clutch, conv at n manual where to extract all the power and torque by pedal to metal. By pedal to metal cvt, the full cvt mode change to 'slow sat mode' where u can see the rev counter climbing slowly to redline(not too slow, it like u r driving only 1 speed gbox, u can see the rev climbing), while in full cvt, the rev can jump to any rpm, depend on input from throttle. When it reach highest rev, it will static, n of course, u will hear the sound really loud, like driving manual, first gear, rev to redline n never change to next gear. Pedal to metal only apply in cvt if u need to reach its top most speed(km/h) which is rarely unless u want to test up what is the top speed of ur car or just suka suka. For example, those who are driving iafm+ cvt, only need to rev around 2k rpm and below for town driving, n 2.5k-3k rpm highway driving, depend on speed u want to reach. If only u want to overtake@needed all the torque available, just pedal up to 4k rpm where the max torque available in engine. Max 85% of throttle input is needed coz beyond 85%,its enter the slow sat mode. So, in daily or normal driving, balik kampung driving, conquer hilly route, climbing high places n etc,no need to rev beyond 4k rpm. Need better power, just slotted to L mode, it rev 20% higher than normal D mode, n throttle will be crispier n engine braking will be apparent. Then, if u drive cvt like what it supposed to, then, the engine sound wont be bugging u too much. Even if u want to gauge the century sprint timing, no need pedal to metal. Just rev up to 4k rpm only coz all torque is there. If u want to get faster timing, slot to L, then rev 4k rpm. While the others keep pedal to metal to reach century sprint n stress the engine to get there(means other 1.6 na with conv auto@manual), u just relaxing cruising at 4k without any jerk due to gear shifting. Erm, it seems they really used 90kmh control env data for fc in cvt iafm+1.6,rather than target fc @90kmh as in flx 1.3. Coz the real data for flx 1.3 iafm+ cvt is 5.65 L/100km@90kmh, but they publish 6 L/100km based on target fc@90kmh. While mixed fc around 7.68L+-/100km So, i think combine fc for iafm+1.6 cvt is around 8L+-/100km. For cfe cvt, no need to comment coz all torque available at 2k rpm, n at 1.5k rpm, already has better torque than iafm+. Just my advice for cfe cvt owners,, try to control ur right foot, dont drive reaching 2k rpm in town driving if u want to extract to most fc for cfe.
cvt after 120kmh u will start to press deeper..cause u know it starts to slowly catching up speed..which results in high rpm during high speed..only 0-120kmh is fast..i say based on insight and inspira 2.0..
This post has been edited by megat89: Apr 7 2012, 09:30 PM
Apr 7 2012, 09:23 PM

Quote
brandless player... sigh
mabuk font...
is he taking picture wit a tablet?
first look of the engine....
memang cun this color.. i wan 1 tq
side profile with hood up... ok lah.. got abit like persona punya feel
0.0319sec
0.33
7 queries
GZIP Disabled