Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
wanna ask, integra dc5
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 5 2012, 11:05 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(alwinnng @ Apr 5 2012, 05:52 PM) izit good?? handling,power,fuel consumption,reliability??? spare parts easy to get??  yup every car its good depend on which perspective u look at... FC should be ok depends how u drive... VTEC technology FC is actually quite good and power delivery the torque very nice too.. reliability definitely is A okay.... price of parts is reasonable as lotsa after market parts too... Which type are u looking at? As long as u love the car and willing to commit i dont think its an issue... make sure u get a reasonable car condition. Added on April 5, 2012, 11:06 pmQUOTE(theanswer @ Apr 5 2012, 10:12 PM) epic yaw~ should get into 9gag.  Added on April 5, 2012, 10:13 pmi thnk got 2 dc5..one is type R..another is type S. there is another guy on the other thread also making me troll hahahaha he says twin cam is like a pair of leg running and single cam is like 1 leg jumping HAHAHAHAHAHAHA This post has been edited by mxsteven: Apr 5 2012, 11:06 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 08:44 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(e36.hartge @ Apr 5 2012, 06:11 PM) its using dual-camshaft-thats already will consume mor fuel then the valve also got 4 for each piston-another factor then the engine block itself is racing-bred =more fuel After reading it for sometime.... it still make my eyes rolling hahahaha Dual camshaft use more fuel hmmmmmm then if i add a few more screws to the cam pulley would it takes more lolssss... Valve also got 4 for each piston  i know the sky drops is called rain and its liquid is called water or what the scientist called H2o Engine block got racing bred hahahahaha i must get MKA cert for my engine block soon.... maybe my engine block is come from champion line...
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 10:42 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(e36.hartge @ Apr 6 2012, 10:14 AM) u stupid or what?im toking that those cars are high fuel usage & giving reason what make its low FC Added on April 6, 2012, 10:24 amI also occasionally drive both my family's K20A & H22A la of coz the DOHC VTEC realy sucks the much more fuel when ONLY VTEC kicks-in after 4000rpm but on low rev,still cannot match singleVTEC car's FC btw,u ever drive merc & bmw together & compare the FC?u know all merc are single-cam & all bmw are twin-cam?thats your lesson for today Lolsssss u really make me laugh rolling from Lowyat 5th Floor to Basement..... Dont you understand how the car works.... go and google wikipedia dude....dont be dildomydude hahahahaha 3 Valve, 4 Valve or 5 Valve does not mean anything about consumption.... it is EFFICIENCY... FC is always depend on the car weight over power ration and the engine displacement. Single cam Vtec can be as good FC as Twin Cam or vice versa.... depend how you drive but for performance wise Twincam had more benefits where the power band is higher and more efficient than Single cam setup....Why manufacturer dont create all twincam? its the cost and design. ALL Merc Single cam???? better go n tanam your head dude..... This post has been edited by mxsteven: Apr 6 2012, 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 10:50 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(e36.hartge @ Apr 6 2012, 10:45 AM) u stupid wan merc all single cam la u dam dam I bet you are the real idiot in the world.... so Merc V8 is single cam lah HAHAHAHAH lolssss i really laugh hard now until basement 5 edi
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 11:17 AM
|
Getting Started

|
I bet u have to tanam your head lotsa time
W116 (1972)
This S-class flooded the streets in my childhood. Nevertheless, I do not have very fond memory of it, blame to its unrefined design. The W116 was born at a time new safety regulations getting effective. This demanded plastic bumpers and rubber side stripes. Unfortunately, like everyone else, Mercedes had not masterminded the art of integrating these safety features into the body shell, so they looked ill-fitted and at odds to the rest of the car.
Style-wise, the W116 was a brave (an unsuccessful) attempt for modernization. Its body shell was widened and lowered. The radiator grille evolved shorter and wider, while traditional circular headlights were replaced with two large rectangular ones with signal lamps integrated. Weight went up by around 100 kg, mostly due to improved safety. To enhance crash protection, the cabin section was made stiffer, and further research improved the progressive crumpling of the front and rear crumple zones. In the cabin, collapsible steering wheel, recessed switches and padded surfaces reduce the level of injury in collision. Fuel tank was relocated from the tail to above the rear axle. These features made the S-class the safest car in the world. Moreover, in its final year, it introduced the world's first ABS anti-lock brake system.
The chassis was a big departure from the previous generation. While the front double-wishbone setup sounds similar, it got anti-dive geometry and zero Kingpin offset (i.e. the steering axis falls onto the center of tire contact patch). The latter improved its steering response and reduced kickback a lot. At the rear, the low-pivot swing axles finally became history, as they were replaced with semi-trailing arms. This tamed the oversteer of its predecessor, making its handling safer and more predictable.
In the powertrain side, the 2.8-liter straight-six of 280SE/SEL became twin-cam and delivered an impressive 185hp (up 25hp). V8 models finally got proper names – 350SE/SEL and 450SE/SEL. They were good for 200hp and 225hp respectively, more or less the same as the ones introduced late in the life of the previous generation. The automatic transmissions now got torque converter instead of the previous fluid coupling for enhanced smoothness.
Autocar tested both 280SE and 450SEL. They topped 125 mph and 134 mph respectively, and accelerated from rest to 60 mph in 9.7 and 9.1 seconds respectively. The 280SE was praised for sweet revving engine, good handling and ride. Performance of 450SEL was disappointing, partly due to the power-sipping 3-speed automatic (lesser models used 4-speed auto), partly due to its extra weight. However, the British magazine praised it for refined ride, responsive handling that belied its size and superb power steering. The latter was light yet quick and free of kickback. No wonder 450SE/SEL was crowned European Car of the Year in 1974.
Like the previous generation, W116 was offered with a high-performance model, 450SEL 6.9. This will be dealt with a separate article.
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 11:23 AM
|
Getting Started

|
nah we just having fun lolsssss no hard feel.... that is how we kill our time lols
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 11:41 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Once again Another day is screwed by MXsteven.....
jeng jeng jeng.......
hahaha who is mojojojojojojojojo
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 11:53 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Vervain @ Apr 6 2012, 11:48 AM) another thread gunned down by Steven. Just want to ask Vtec really engage at 4k? Sorry, I never own a vtec car before. nah not gun down by me.... Vtec engage depends on models... and iVtec works differently.... the old heritage Vtec normally kick in about 4.2k and some 4.8k... B16A if not mistaken 4.2k and B18C and H22A 4.8k.... i cant confirm... u need to google hahaha but im sure B16A is 4.2k coz my civic with my brother is B16A auto.... everytime Vtec kicks in the gear change lololololssss
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 12:01 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(sengasdf @ Apr 6 2012, 11:53 AM) K20A Type-R drinks RON97, no? yup 97.... all honda type R recomended to use 97 due to the ignition timing table... if not it will be knocking and jerking hahahaha i still remember someone drove his fren type R and fill 95 then later become subaru hahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 01:36 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(sengasdf @ Apr 6 2012, 12:29 PM) B16A also drinks RON97 right? B16A drink any fuel but not rootbeer hahaha Added on April 6, 2012, 1:37 pmQUOTE(Mayor @ Apr 6 2012, 12:25 PM) my b16a kicking vtech at 4.9k, and that true the new type-r only drink 97. ic... yours is manual or auto? maybe my car being rechip edi coz when i bought its edi japan mod edi... come with freebies hahaha This post has been edited by mxsteven: Apr 6 2012, 01:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 04:37 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(holydevil @ Apr 6 2012, 04:19 PM) i know u love Vtek tek hahahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 05:06 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Fuuuhhh all tech kaki come in edi....
i sit behind eat popcorn
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 6 2012, 08:30 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(ReidenLing @ Apr 6 2012, 08:11 PM) Yeah hell yeah...Myvi lagi best lagi power Its Lagi power Lagi Best hahahaha..... MYVI should do 8 Valve Single cam.... so less stuff less makan minyak HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 7 2012, 10:53 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(e36.hartge @ Apr 7 2012, 01:16 AM) Idiot u think my standrd that low?u even bother check my previous what it mean by 3valves per piston/silinder? U ever drive SOHC V6 engine with 18valves instead of DOHC V6 engine with 24valves????and yes FC between both are so much different Added on April 7, 2012, 1:26 amIts the setting of each silinder la,and each manufacturer got their decision on how many parts should in the ngine Even only using single cam,4valves can be attached to each piston Its not fixed rule to say twin-cam must be coupled with 16valves Heck even got 1 toyota engine(I forgot) DOHC inline4 but with 20valves(5valves for each piston) and it meant for high torque on low-end Now u know its realy true afterall But yes those I saw is 90s and early 2000 engine,nowaday got soft-turbo to assist high-torque on low-end without sacrifice FCFinally something that you say is true..... couldnt agree more... this is what we called improve efficiency
|
|
|
|
|
|
mxsteven
|
Apr 7 2012, 11:45 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Daniel John @ Apr 7 2012, 11:28 AM) Where is the talking about dc5.... Hahahahahaha.. kaw kaw out of topic edi lols pity the TS thread kena hijack kaw kaw
|
|
|
|
|