planning to fund for new lens soon.
Currently eye-ing on either
1. Sony 55-200 (2 versions though)
2. Tamron 70-300
Which one is recommended? Both almost same price range.
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V57!, The Orange Legion
|
|
 Mar 24 2012, 09:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004 
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Mar 24 2012, 10:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 24 2012, 10:12 PM) Lacus, get the 55-200 ver.II (aka SAM version) aside from compability with FF dslr, any other main difference from the v1? And Tamron not recommended? (although further in terms of zoom) |
|
|
Mar 24 2012, 10:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Mar 24 2012, 10:28 PM) why u hate me? err don't get ya. But thanks for the feedback   DSC06838 by zstan, on Flickr version one is screw driven and always has the possibility to get <omg i cant remember the term>.  QUOTE(lwliam @ Mar 24 2012, 10:34 PM) version 1 AND version 2 of the 55-200 SAL/SAM also isn't a full frame lens... both are designed for APSC only. Thanks for the feedback ^ and that is why u hetchu you mean gear strip? .. Now time to survey pricing |
|
|
Mar 25 2012, 01:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(NutZ748 @ Mar 25 2012, 12:01 AM) go for 55-200 SAM!!! Thanks for the reply. Decided already. Can lend yours to play around ar its super bang for buck!!!  my previous post (bird photo) is taken by that lens  another 55-200 SAM shot » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Added on March 25, 2012, 12:09 amwent photoshooting with fellow Sony-ians... Flash-mily meeting...F42 F43 F58  behind the schenes  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 11:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Further in than Kuala Selangor, and yeah it's far
|
|
|
Mar 28 2012, 03:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
well it's near for me though since i stay nearby =P..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 29 2012, 11:54 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Been so busy with work lately and haven
 ] lately.Awaiting end of April to get the lens  @NutZ748,happy birthday bro! |
|
|
Apr 4 2012, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
Count me in for the TT
 , wanna try the 55-200 This post has been edited by Lacus: Apr 4 2012, 02:29 PM |
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 09:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
55-200 V1 and V2 is there a huge difference? Getting one soon. Current got a good offer for 55-200 but v1 :/
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 11:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
so technically V1 or V2=almost same shit =.=?
|
|
|
May 1 2012, 03:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Staff
5,250 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(zstan @ Apr 30 2012, 11:42 PM) they are not shit... given good lighting conditions they can produce very nice and sharp images..... ooh i actually meant SAM and without=almost the same lens? D:.. thanks for the feedback guys |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0488sec
 0.53
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 08:11 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.