Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Chang'e-2 Orbiter, Alien Moon Base

views
     
TSnorther
post Mar 15 2012, 02:16 PM, updated 14y ago

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


China claims will be releasing Hi Res images taken by the Chang'e-2 moon orbiter, which clearly show buildings and structures on the moons surface. He also claims NASA has deliberately bombed important areas of the Moon in an effort to destroy ancient artefacts and facility's.

Pictures yet to be released clearly show nuclear impact craters and building debris caused by explosions in an effort by NASA to destroy the truth.China is moving toward full disclosure of the Extraterrestrial reality, if these images and future ones are verified genuine then NASA should be investigated for fraud and treason. China will be releasing all the data and images from the Chang'e-2 in the coming weeks and months, lets hope this is the beginning of a new era.

"The narration by Karl Wolf has nothing to do with the images in this video. I included the narration by Karl Wolf merely to help the viewer realise that the cover-up by NASA concerning Alien structures on the Moon has been going on for decades".

Please compare moon image with this one, does this prove the image is a fake, disinfo, or is it proof that NASA has indeed airbrushed important structures out of its published photographs of the lunar surface, and possibly leaked this picture claiming it to be from the Chang'e-2 Orbiter in an effort to cast doubt and suspicion on any further images that are pending release. You as always be the judge.

Click here for images details : Images
thelion4ever
post Mar 15 2012, 03:10 PM

Olga Kurylenko
*****
Senior Member
967 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Klang


What the.... shocking.gif MUst watch video..
BillySteel
post Mar 15 2012, 03:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
661 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Yankee Territory


Alien conspiracy theory belongs in Phd.

Where is the proof that China has made such a claim?

+ a nuke explosion on the moon can easily be detected by telescope/probes on the orbit or from earth.

But the resolution of the image.......wow!
thunderaj
post Mar 15 2012, 03:23 PM

General Manager
******
Senior Member
1,175 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
this is one thing i can think off.. transformer 3 ....is coming true...


3dassets
post Mar 15 2012, 03:30 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


Bad photo reconstruction, inconsistent film exposure of light deflection according to rage or distance, meaning the dimension of negative film cannot possibly capture the small details. How to tell the difference? Between Light & shadow is not black & white, bright light causes over exposure and create halo effect.

If the story is true, separate image is imposed into it.

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Mar 15 2012, 03:32 PM
TSnorther
post Mar 15 2012, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(3dassets @ Mar 15 2012, 03:30 PM)
Bad photo reconstruction, inconsistent film exposure of light deflection according to rage or distance, meaning the dimension of negative film cannot possibly capture the small details. How to tell the difference? Between Light & shadow is not black & white, bright light causes over exposure and create halo effect.

If the story is true, separate image is imposed into it.
*
The resolution of the images obtained from Chang'e-2 is 17 times finer than those taken by its predecessor Chang'e-1.
If there were airports and harbours on the moon, the Chang'e-1 could just identify them while Chang'e-2 could detect the planes or ships in them. The scientists also made some adjustments to the original data to more accurately reflect the topographic and geomorphologic features of the moon.The scientists have produced 746 moon pictures with the resolution of seven meters, and the total volume of data is about 800 GB.

Here i have the 800 GB of picures...anyone up for the challenge?

SoSMoonView

and.... For consideration:
Lunar Orbiter III, Launched 1967, Photo Gallery Frame 3085

SoSLunarOrbiterIII
transhumanist92
post Mar 15 2012, 05:06 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
255 posts

Joined: Feb 2008
From: Prison Planet


NASA sees things that makes their hair stand up every day, that's why they are not talking. They don't know how to put into words what they see. Yeah on Mars too.
3dassets
post Mar 15 2012, 07:03 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(norther @ Mar 15 2012, 04:21 PM)
The resolution of the images obtained from Chang'e-2 is 17 times finer than those taken by its predecessor Chang'e-1.
If there were airports and harbours on the moon, the Chang'e-1 could just identify them while Chang'e-2 could detect the planes or ships in them. The scientists also made some adjustments to the original data to more accurately reflect the topographic and geomorphologic features of the moon.The scientists have produced 746 moon pictures with the resolution of seven meters, and the total volume of data is about 800 GB.

Here i have the 800 GB of picures...anyone up for the challenge?

SoSMoonView

and.... For consideration:
Lunar Orbiter III, Launched 1967, Photo Gallery Frame 3085

SoSLunarOrbiterIII
*
The above video show photo manipulation defect just like some ufo hoax images, though some are quite convincing, where are the pictures taken by Chang'e-2 that indicate alien space ship and building?

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Mar 15 2012, 07:04 PM
TSnorther
post Mar 15 2012, 08:16 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
user posted image
1:04

IF... this is real... which I highly doubt... I am pretty sure it is manmade
... just my two...
3dassets
post Mar 15 2012, 08:32 PM

Absolutely no nonsense
*******
Senior Member
3,796 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


QUOTE(norther @ Mar 15 2012, 08:16 PM)
user posted image
1:04

IF... this is real... which I highly doubt... I am pretty sure it is manmade
... just my two...
*
That is the problem, the geometrical shaped structure does not match the exposure density mass. It look like an enlarged image and added details and finer than the rest of the terrain, also a bit odd in perspective, isn't this picture from 1970s, where are the recent pictures?

This post has been edited by 3dassets: Mar 15 2012, 08:35 PM
TSnorther
post Mar 15 2012, 08:58 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
226 posts

Joined: Feb 2012
QUOTE(3dassets @ Mar 15 2012, 08:32 PM)
That is the problem, the geometrical shaped structure does not match the exposure density mass. It look like an enlarged image and added details and finer than the rest of the terrain, also a bit odd in perspective, isn't this picture from 1970s, where are the recent pictures?
*
QUOTE
China will be releasing all the data and images from the Chang’e-2 in the coming weeks and months, lets hope this is the beginning of a new era.


that one picture from 1976-Lunar Orbiter III


 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0172sec    0.30    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 06:54 AM