Good gawd.. the fler no fingers nor Excel to count, nor literate enough to comprehend

Wei - the great Company & "investors" can't use "interest" and now can't use "hibah", then use what?
$ from sky ar?
Sorry ar Pink - just using your posting as a leverage

Wei - dont give the DADS (dumb as d** s***) ideas to further kill my $100K in EPF pls

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Jul 14 2012, 10:43 AM

Dude - ever heard of the Madoff scam? Ran for donkey of years but finally...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madoff_investment_scandal

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Jul 14 2012, 10:48 AM

Is he? IF he stopped investing and pulled out already, yes.
IF not, the gold is in his hand now or not? Do an Excel calculation - 2 years.. with the buyback by Company at the end of the contract and buy anew again by your friend (higher gold price assumed) for a new contract, U sure he's safe?

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Jul 14 2012, 10:51 AM

Holy crap - dated 13/07/2012 22:10
So fast kaboom? Sorry ar bro - i used google translate and read it as kaboom

*koff koff*
"We've got BNM directors and Syariah Compliance senior auditors on board with us to correct the misunderstanding/situation."

Got deleted due to:
Too much advertisement in her/his siggy gua
OR
obviously misleading post since Geneva Malaysia (new) AND Geneva (old) on BNM's watchlist liao + "hibbah" tak boleh guna + "interest" pun tak boleh guna

BTW, this fellow also never replied to my Excel on the calculations posted on an old thread/topic started by him/her, simulating returns 1 to 5 years based his/her website on Geneva's structure + on gold prices stagnate, goes up or falls. Numbers are hard to "lie" unless one is a professional "statistician"

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Jul 31 2012, 08:32 AM

or someone's having their (golden) goose cooked

VETO power ke? Thought Augustxxx has that, not the birdie?

I like your Golum impression..
..and One company to rule them all (suckers)

Ok ok sorry ar Mod(s) for turning slightly into kopitiam style posting, can't help myself. Comedy lar the paper thin defence and i seriously like the Golum and gold thinggy

Unless BNM made some severe printing errors, i don't think we're stupid enough to test Genneva with our hard earned $.

Look son <koff><koff>, most of us old folks here knows that one doesn't need to test a black mamba's bite to know it's deadly, we just R&D and learn/check from various trusted sources. In fact, common sense tells U something's fishy already, unless greed has already gotten it's fangs into one.

Now, if U do want to test something which is ALREADY known to be bad for U (health or finance), do go ahead but making statements about cyber troopers? A person with 2 posts in LYN is slinging that all the fellows here posting are cyber troopers? Too rich a comedy

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Aug 3 2012, 11:08 PM

We not as "atas" as them "investors" mar, thus the secrets of the investments are lost on us.
Nevermind lar, something about leading cows to water but can't force cows to drink.
We go drink from more statistically probable water lar

Side note: Eh - keep buying up ICAP ar boss, i want the general offer hehe

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Aug 6 2012, 08:59 AM

Not to mention it's not too statistically smart to risk $ that way

Diff strokes for diff folks lor.
I don't want to keep worrying about my investments
+
i don't want to be chopped into little pieces if i shared/CONvince some folks into it and the music stops playing
Not too nice mar right? Not going to be one of those "anything for $" - still have a conscience or right/not too right.

Well, that's just me.
Others who are lucky enough to ignore both items above, good for them lar

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Aug 8 2012, 03:25 PM

From your fellow Genneva Malaysia supporter, stating about BNM, Syariah, BAFIA - maybe he's from a different marketing spin from yours?:
http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2265281/+108
"...Hello, it involves religious Syariah Laws compliance and you think the religious advisors from BNM will acccept frauds?? Don't tell me they were paid off.........PLEASE! Don't insult these people in BNM and the Syariah Law experts who are religious people!! I heard one of the Advisor from BNM SITs on the Board of Genneva as advisor and observer that Genneva practise the Syariah Law Compliancein its fullest compliance. Please don't confuse the public!!!! Luckily, i'm not confused."


http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2265281/+115
"... but 'funnily' BNM still allow them to operate, coming to 2 years now! Since they have a Syariah law professor as advisor from BNM on their board and 3 other professors in Genneva panel including one seconded from a bank, BNM should know, they do have their own officers checking on companies like them. My question is, why didn't BNM and ROC strike Genneva off?? I was told that Genneva is also reporting to BNM on a monthly basis. So that is why i couldn't believe all the talk about Genneva being scam (very easy to shut down these kind of companies). These rumours could have come from different quarters who were severely affected by Genneva's operations. They were also investigated for breaking the AMLA act. But investigation is going on but this is not investigation into scam. Todate I was told that BNM could find any misdeeds by Genneva. ..."


http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/2265281/+117
"..High profile names. They are in the papers and on Genneva's office wall and videos. Or you can get from the company officers. A good many. Syariah Law professors? A good many. Ask any Genneva consultants. They should know if not i'll be SURPRISED!!!!

When we go into Syariah Law, it is debatable, a big topic beyond our grips. But at least we know they come under the purview of BNM. That is good enough for me. At least the top authority is into this and provides guidelines, particularly for those who practise Islamic banking and financial operations to be able to 'profit' from it righteously in their way of religion. That is, this law for the Muslims. Then, this guideline is even stricter in the sense as it stems from trying to conduct it religiously, if you know what i mean. So at least the higher authority BNM knows what is going on.

That is all i have to say..."

Bro, it's ok lar, there are people like that - they think $ is everything.
And most of us, ranging from poor as dirt (me) to multi-millionaires near retirement age fellows (), are stating it's not a right thing to do - to profit from some poor sod believing in such a thing,
who are coming in late into the game,
thus enabling the scheme to pay the earlier folks,
which suckers more poor sods into the game.

Karma & payback's a b*tch.

Hellthy competition? (yes, purposely spelt wrongly )
http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...&#entry53705530

whoops - that topic/thread missing.. nuked by Mods methinks

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopic=2463471 whoa.. new topic again!

This post has been edited by wongmunkeong: Aug 9 2012, 05:05 PM

Mr Pokemonkiller. Needn't be so angry lar - U share your pro Genneva views, others share their "becareful" views.
Thus, if U can share your gung-ho support, why can't others balance the scale by stating some items to be aware of?

Don't lar start attacking personally - all the "becareful" views are stating evidences, whereas from my perspective, the supporters of Genneva are stating "heresays" and no solid evidences. Note - evidence = from a reputable third party, say BNM,
or
a "business profit method" thus Genneva can afford to pay back their "investors", or now known as "traders".
or
the structurally iffy (to the "traders"/buyers) contracts one has to sign.

Just a thought - not wishing anyone's "backside tear" as U so eloquently put it to EddyLB
".... So many negative remarks coming from you people already tarnishing the image, I guess by the time you managed to see him, your backside will tear already.."

hehe - no worries ProphetJul.
I think Sya's just responding via my post to Pokemon or other supporters.

Funny lor - supporters getting personal, ie. attacking personal or sounding more & more like thugs.
If readers can see with 100% clarity those who are posting "bewares" evidences and where "we are coming from" (ie. we don't really need the hassle to post such but we've been through / seen some cons before and THIS looks similar.... thus beware), especially U, a gold investor when it was DOWN in the pits (talk about buying ultra low.. heheh)