Bioware is really creating another ending or saving it for the DLC?

I think that's the proper attitude to take in regards to the ending of the game.

I can understand why people might not be happy with the ending(s) but finding comfort in tin foil hat fan fiction is a worst case example of fans with entitlement issues.

But since everyone seems to want to create a theory to justify their time spent on ME1-3, I'm getting in on the fun as well. Here are my choice theories:

1.  Much like the end of Star Trek 2, Liara did a vulcan/asari mind meld on you just before the final battle, which gives bioware the opportunity for a DLC entitled "The search for Shepard".  Much hilarity ensues.

2.  In the synthesis ending, Shepard gets turned into a zombie and the next DLC involves the adventures of Zombie Shepard and his battle against Plants.  You also get to make difficult moral decisions which involve deciding which of your love interests to turn and the classic question of "brains or brraaaains?"

3.  in line with Occam's razor, which posits that the simplest explanation is usually the right one, bioware just majorly underestimated the effect of their lazyman endings on their fans.

Can't believe no one has linked this article http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2012/03/19...ffect-3s-ending which more or less echoes what i wrote earlier