Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
24 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 PROTON SAGA BLM, FL, FLX CLUB V20, Saga FLX SE 1.6 Manual -> New God car??

views
     
TSdares
post Mar 24 2012, 08:38 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 24 2012, 08:36 PM)
Yeah, Insulfex is too thick...or maybe can try forcing it? Will try with a few 'good morning towels'  first icon_rolleyes.gif
*
Where you plan to put it exactly?
TSdares
post Mar 24 2012, 08:44 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(keanyuu @ Mar 24 2012, 08:42 PM)
so you ur sound insulation already?? wonder which part to add in..cause saga really sound like tin kosong...when go batu hit the body.
*
Do your doors first. That's the easiest (relatively speaking.... sweat.gif )

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 24 2012, 08:44 PM
TSdares
post Mar 24 2012, 08:59 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 24 2012, 08:53 PM)
Right on top of the fuel pump. If that fails, the whole rear seat area. If that fails, use the towel for household  laugh.gif
*
Yea...done that. PHAIL! doh.gif

I dunno about the whining sound during driving, but when I turn the key to the notch before the engine starts, I can still clearly hear the fuel pump run for a while then stop.

QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 24 2012, 08:53 PM)
When opening the panel must be very patient...if not..snap!  sweat.gif
*
Yes yes. Come share my pain dry.gif

QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 24 2012, 08:53 PM)
Saga S16 should also look almost the same. This is probably the reason why ANCAP did not release the side impact crash test video for our Saga  whistling.gif
*
I think few B-seg cars can survive a T-bone from a truck sweat.gif
TSdares
post Mar 24 2012, 09:42 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 24 2012, 09:07 PM)
Cover the whole area also fail?
*
I din't cover the whole bench la...but quite a large area also at the center right over the fuel pump.

I think the main problem is, the fuel pump itself is REALLY loud, imagine the cushion seat also cannot cover the noise, what can a 10mm layer of insulflex do?
TSdares
post Mar 24 2012, 11:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(omara86 @ Mar 24 2012, 10:08 PM)
Pic from car display event today...
*
Naiiss. Hardcore poroton and r3 fan ftw smile.gif

QUOTE(tanpanama @ Mar 24 2012, 10:35 PM)
anybody user FLX se got same prob like u?
*
As far as i am told, it is a rare defect.

QUOTE(Enclave Recruit @ Mar 24 2012, 10:41 PM)
Just attended the unveiling of the new BMW F30 3 series.

I sat in it. Smelled it. Touched it and pressed it.

The next Proton Saga should have gear lever like this  brows.gif

*
But did you lick it? Must lick it u know. shakehead.gif

Saga to get that gearknob? Maybe 20 years later when u can get it aftemarket doh.gif
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 01:50 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Enclave Recruit @ Mar 25 2012, 12:11 AM)
Too many people around haha. No chance for tongue action...

Have a little faith my friend. Proton already has turbo and cvt tech. Soon, 8 speed gb and super cool gear knob should be within grasp.
*
Unfortunately, turbo for production cars has been around since the 1960s, the CVT for production cars since 1920s laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 02:16 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
Welcome to the Campro griever's club rclxms.gif

Are you driving it the same way you did your 1.6 wira?


Added on March 25, 2012, 2:17 am
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 25 2012, 01:56 AM)
Malaysia car manufacturers actually quite smart...Letting the North American and European manufactures become guinea pigs for new techs  thumbup.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif  laugh.gif
*
Maybe we'll get DCTs by 2050 tongue.gif

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 25 2012, 02:17 AM
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 03:33 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Mar 25 2012, 03:04 AM)
Frankly, I'm not too sure. I drove my WIRA with vacuum meter, other than pickup from traffic lights, normally I try to maintain below 15 in/hg while cruising. Currently I still couldn't find any pillar holder for my BLM, so the meter is not on yet. After many years training, I believe my right foot is quite sensitive with the pedal. HOWEVER, the only problem now is the drive by wire, I can no longer feel the throttle body, the angle of the butterfly. So, all I can feel is the car had to go smooth, without sudden acceleration. I normally will not purposely shift up before the car run smooth, as I learn this from previous vacuum meter training also. Before the car got enough torque, there is no use to shift up as you'll lose more momentum on a higher gear with lower speed, alas you lose more petrol trying to gain back the momentum. So, besides of the 6krpm crazy thing, I think I did almost the same driving style as my WIRA 1.6.

So, I believe I'm DRIVING the right way(before I get my vacuum meter hooked up, now all are bullshit). I just couldn't believe I'm that bad in driving a car without reading the vacuum meter. How can people do up to 15km/liter whereas I only manage to do average 10km/liter. Moreover, I do like 50% highway cruising. To cut the crap short, reading fuelly is more reliable heh?

user posted image

Any help is much appreciated. Current mileage clocked at 16000. I'm suspecting WRONG engine oil can make such harm too. Before I get this car, the reseller took it for a service, not sure what oil he puts in. BUT, I've tried diesel engine oil on my ISWARA too, it still doesn't hurt the mileage that much. Any input is much appreciated.

By the way, is this the correct thread I ask for this kind of question? If there is any other thread talking about fuel efficiency, please direct me there. Don't wanna be a threadjacker.

Thanks and regards,

Dave
*
I don't think the lack of reference to a vacuum gauge should cause your FC to shoot up, else many people driving a MT BLM will have bad FC.

At what RPM do you normally shift in the BLM?
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 11:20 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(davidke20 @ Mar 25 2012, 10:26 AM)
Normally is around 2krpm ~ 2.5krpm shift up, depends on how long I drag the thing. The slower I drive, I drag the shift longer like every gear up takes 4~5 seconds.

I also dont think lack of reference to a vacuum can cause such crazy FC. Just wanted to find out what went wrong with my car. sad.gif
No choice, every good thing must come to an end(comes to think of it, only bad things is never ending story). The roof is rusted badly, beyond repair jor, gotta torch it out and get an OEM roof to fix it, that alone cost RM800. New paint will cost another 2000 on a 2k ruby green. Engine is running at optimal. I change engine oil/oil filter EVERY MONTH! New aircond compressor/cooling coil/hose/gas, just changed the entire damn thing last Christmas. Thats why you see such crazy fuel economy on it. 15cent/km is pretty good for a 16 years old car, without loan repayment and stuff. Just wifey and family complain too much, really gotta sell it ady.
*
Well then i am out of ideas. The only other reasons i can think of is that your ECU is outta whack, IAFM rosak,you have a dirty engine or you frequently carry full load in your car.
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 07:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(mieza @ Mar 25 2012, 03:04 PM)
So its all about speed.. Sure my father not allow to buy 1.6 sad.gif
*
In terms of FC, choose 1.6 if:

you always drive highway and/or
you always climb hill and/or
you always carry load in the car


QUOTE(SiuYi @ Mar 25 2012, 03:06 PM)
just to round it up, FC depends on RPM. the higher the RPM goes when u pedal the fuel, the more it drinks. so even a tebo car if u drive at RPM 2.5k, it will still drink as much as a 1.3 saga at 2.5k (i doubt it goes for the same as kancil 660 lar~)  whistling.gif
*
Actually 1.3 CVT and 1.6 CVT cruise at the same RPM (unless you are running on SAT), but supposedly 1.6 can reach said RPM faster than 1.3.

And I also don't think wrapping leather will cost RM 2k gua ohmy.gif

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 25 2012, 07:12 PM
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 10:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(cuteyman @ Mar 25 2012, 09:42 PM)
yeah thats my plan actually..see which 1 fit the best..but since mine is grey..nothing much expected lar  cry.gif

btw naiss stripe though.. thumbup.gif
*
If your base color is dark, then stick silver stickers lor.
TSdares
post Mar 25 2012, 10:25 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(V12Kompressor @ Mar 25 2012, 09:14 PM)
rpm or speed? hmm.gif
*
Speed definitely...rpm, hmmm hmm.gif
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 11:30 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Mar 26 2012, 10:41 AM)
1.6 and 1.3 still have different even cruising @ same 2500rpm, dun forget the extra 0.3L, fill with what? Air only ah? of course need more fuel ma... doh.gif Unless it tuned for more leaner than 1.3 version, else the FC is still higher than 1.3 one...

For sport car, if the car have 6 or 8 pistons let say, it will definitely need more fuel @ same engine speed.

Easy theory, why FLX CVT RPM is alot lower than mine BLM MT, but it still consume around same FC @ highway? Dun forget @ 110km/h, CVT @ 2600rpm, while my MT need 3600rpm leh...

So, i agree if 1.6 have same or even better FC as 1.3 @ city drive, if @ highway @ same engine speed, NO.
*
I suppose that is right practically between a 1.3 and 1.6 saga, but the theory is not necessarily true.

A car rolling down a hill at 2,600 RPM due to engine braking, will consume less fuel than a car going up hill at 2,600 RPM, so the same 2,600 RPM does not mean fuel consumption is the same.

The idea behind a 1.6 being more fuel efficient is that due to it's larger displacement, it takes less energy (fuel) to sustain the engine at 2,600 RPM compared to a 1.3.

FC is affected by how large and how long your throttle stays open, not just the RPM.

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 11:32 AM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 12:57 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(poweredbydiscuz @ Mar 26 2012, 12:09 PM)
doesn't make sense to me. if put 5.0L engine into saga (other factors remain), it become super fuel efficient?
*
Of course not.

Imagine this:

a little kid pushing a 50kg crate up a slope - huff and puff the most, can hardly move, consumes more food, but he has little muscle mass, so the energy is not spent efficiently and turns into heat.

An adult pushing a 50kg up a slope - huff and puff too, but because his muscle mass is optimal, he is able to to use energy more efficiently.

A giant pushing a 50kg up a slope - uses his finger to push. But because he is massive, he consumes twice as much energy as a normal size adult just to sustain his body weight and muscle mass.

Now change the crate into a 500kg one, the little kid will die, the adult will die, and the giant will become the most efficient force to push it.

I dunno if this is a proper analogy, but it's the best I can come up with at the moment.

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 12:58 PM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 01:05 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 26 2012, 01:02 PM)
Excellent explanation...but...an adult does require more food intake than child?  hmm.gif
*
Yes, when not under load. Same reason why higher cc engine will consume more fuel in urban driving conditions than a lower cc. Even during idling a higher cc will consume more fuel.

When under load like the example above, the kid can eat and eat and eat but the energy is wasted simply because there is not enough muscle mass to convert the food into pushing force. He becomes less efficient than the adult.

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 01:05 PM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 01:11 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(poweredbydiscuz @ Mar 26 2012, 01:07 PM)
nice explanation

to my understanding, a larger engine consumes more fuel to do the same work (a giant and an adult both can push the 50kg crate, but the giant needs more foods to substain its size). but a larger engine is capable to handle and do a lot more work, produce higher hp and top speed (giant can push 200kg but adult cannot).
*
The key is efficiency. Given the same load, which engine will handle the load most efficiently (least amount of fuel for max amount of energy generated)

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 01:12 PM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 01:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(ibnuasad @ Mar 26 2012, 01:09 PM)
dares is a car nutritionist  drool.gif  icon_rolleyes.gif  notworthy.gif  laugh.gif
*
doh.gif

QUOTE(poweredbydiscuz @ Mar 26 2012, 01:15 PM)
agree. normal driving smaller engine has better fc. always push the car to highspeed then larger engine probably gives better fc.
*
nod.gif thumbup.gif


Added on March 26, 2012, 1:21 pm
QUOTE(Nikole @ Mar 26 2012, 01:10 PM)
Hey I got the same prob. I sent to EON for a check-up but the sound is still there. More like clicking sound when I began to brake. Then when the car slows down, the knocking sound began to appeared. It really annoys me. At first I decided to just ignore but I scared it became worse and in the end leads to an accident. Luckily my car is still under warranty and I don't have to spend a penny. *sigh*
*
Pls visit CoSE.

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 01:21 PM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 01:50 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Mar 26 2012, 01:40 PM)
Not to mention others car or whatever engine, just for our Saga, 1.6 consumption will NOT better than 1.3, the most only same (i doubt so).

I know your @ equal RPM different consumption theory, just like 1.3 fetching 5 persons or only driver alone, of course for 5 persons sure FC is higher.

Thats why i only agree efficiency, YES. Consumption, NO.

I just want to highlight some misleading fact, some ppl tends to confuse between efficiency and consumption. If go for 1.6 for 'almost same amount of FC but get more powerful ride', this one i have no objection. But If go for 1.6 for 'better FC', they will gonna disappointed.

*
That's why I said practically, you're probably right.

BTW, is 1.6 campro heavier? the difference is only the stroke length, the block is basically the same, no?

What did you use to silence your fuel pump?

This post has been edited by dares: Mar 26 2012, 01:51 PM
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 02:36 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(coolkwc @ Mar 26 2012, 02:24 PM)
I assume they need longer conrod? Means heavier... hmm.gif
*
hmm.gif hmm.gif

QUOTE(coolkwc @ Mar 26 2012, 02:24 PM)
Rear boot and floor by
user posted image

My main purpose is for dampening last time, side effect, sound insulation too.
*
Looks expensive, how much?

QUOTE(kenjilew @ Mar 26 2012, 02:17 PM)
hmm... looks like after ericmaxman moved to viva club all the fc topic is digged up from the graveyards... biggrin.gif
*
Saga thread ma, mostly will be about rattle sound, FC, drumbrake etc. etc. You guys do performance mod also seldom post here dry.gif.

Want something interesting ah? Who wanna organize konvoi to outstation? PD? Cameron Highlands? Melaka? Ipoh? etc. etc.
TSdares
post Mar 26 2012, 03:03 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(kenjilew @ Mar 26 2012, 02:45 PM)
konvoi to outstation sure can one... just that the timing all tak ngam... sad.gif
*
Early-mid May,weekend 2 days 1 nite, who's interested? Nanti I tepuk sebelah tangan macam sohigh here.

24 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0564sec    0.65    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 03:46 AM