Yea u not the first person having tons of problem with digi and n9. Another fella here change 3 to 4 phones still have this issue

logically it shouldnt lose signal. Last time used to happen to be sudden shake or drop lose signal need to restart or reinsert the simcard.

It keep happening until one day it becomes permanent. After replace the motherboard drop also wont lose signal.
Lumia 800 and 900 never lose signal before when drop

i dont think you can get replacement on that black spot but warranty depends on the centre. You can try amcorp mall Nokia i got mine replace in 3 days i am very happy for the N9.

if the spare part is available usually very fast

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Aug 13 2012, 02:31 PM

what is your definition of worth?

In price?
In Build quality?
In OS?
In Apps?
In Brand?

fixed

Very Cham we are the test subject

Body - Nokia n9 and Nokia lumia 800/900
Camera - Nokia 808 pureview
OS - Microsoft

In 920 there is no pureview tech over sampling and lossless zoom. Now become puremotion

That's why its call a twist. You notice lately Nokia have so much confusion until we dunno which is which.

Why is Nokia 808 called Nokia 808 pureview?For it's over sampling and lossless zoom? That's the only thing u can do on a 808 pureview in pureview mode.

I have a 808 with me in the camera setting there a full resolution and pureview.

So conclusion it's a twist so now he twist phase 2 is u remove your key ingredients at a new ingredients then call it pureview phase 2?

In pureview u can choose 8mp,5mp and 3mp.

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 10:49 AM

If you read the 808 it's all about over sampling and lossless and Nokia rich recording

If they have stated clearly pureview is just a tech at the beginning and say 808 is phase 1 then what you just said make sense.

But like u said lets wait till 3rd party review out we will know especially today mobile reviewer

Yea maybe they believe the name is already there so just use it back. I agree what u said should not use back the word pureview could use something pure something won't that misleading

Then it becomes more confusing then Damien can say whatever he wants. So if pureview phase 3 then they add lossless zoom? Hahaha

I read someone said after watching the OIS conspiracy theory he said I thought beta tester was over. I was wrong this just the beginning hahaha

Sifu don't misunderstand we are not bashing we are just pointing out standard technology goes up not go eveywhere. What sifu and Nokia is doing they call it twisiting.

If u read the white paper It uses a few pixels to create a super pixel that where they give your photo the extra detail so the more you zoom the less pixels it use.

We don't just read the word pureview then immediately assume everything. What Damien is doing is call twisting.

So your definition of pureview aka twist version regardless what Nokia do to the camera the tech is call pureview. So If tomorrow they decided to put edof sensor and add pureview word it become amazing?

I totally agree with sifu Andy. Your definition of tech is so confusing because you listen too much to Damien. Is Damien a professional photographer? So how reliable is his info? So if he said a cow can fly we still believe Sifu Andy explaination are about facts and figures they post.

Resulting 808 pureview is just for marketing the word pureview but not the tech from a 808.

The 920 camera is totally a different thing when u compare to a 808? The word pureview is just for marketing purposes

Lossless zoom
Nokia 808 pureview

Nokia rich recording
Nokia 808 pureview

Nokia oversampling technology
Nokia 808 pureview

High megapixels
Nokia 808 pureview

Nd filter
Nokia 808 pureview

You notice the 920 tech have nothing to do with 808.

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 02:04 PM

Before this I was impressed with pureview after they twist and turn until like that I myself don't even know what the heck is pureview except Damien himself.

He only bring a tech only he understand.

Sorry haha please define apa dia punnya standard. I also would like to know its like a lot consumer iPhone 4S and s3 camera quality standard is sufficient they don't need a Nokia.

Haha anyway no offense to anyone. If I would have bought a 808 pureview I would be bloody piss now

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 02:18 PM

If 21mp it still consider as upgrade because most phones are only between 12 to 16

End up only 8 isn't that a joke. Samseng already 13

So end of this year Samseng come out 16. Nokia still start 12.

What i really impressed was Nokia rich recording.

Conclusion we have no right to define anything it's because they do not define it clearly it creates confusion.

Just imagine how many piss of Nokia lumia 800/900 users now. Same price the newer model got so much value than the old only in less than 2months

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 02:26 PM

Indeed nicely said

What Nokia trying say we shouldn't look forward for upgrade but downgrade? So ppl will be like what 930 will be like downgrade to 5mp?

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 02:45 PM

If what Nokia claim the 920 can do the 808 pureview also can't do. When u take anything against the light without flash it will be darken and not lit up like their so called demo of 920

2k I rather go for iPhone 5 or iPad mini at least I know I have a good reseller value

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 03:12 PM

Weird since the announcement of the Nokia 920 my Flickr got close to 7,000 hits a day viewing my Nokia 808 photos lol

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 03:16 PM

Looks fake for my dslr to do that star takes at least 5 seconds long exposure with a tripod

Problem wireless charging is only useful if you always put at the same spot. I prefer plug cable faster

Hahaha so pureview is everything about Nokia imaging Hahahahahahh.