QUOTE(KennyKB @ Jun 11 2012, 04:38 PM)
I think the 808 is overpriced. I see it catering to a very niche market. Is it a phone with a camera or a camera which can make phone calls? There is no balance grafting such a high quality camera system onto a phone running (almost) outdated Symbian. It's like putting a 200HP engine into a plain looking family car. Most users will like the camera but not the OS. Nokia should have no fear that it will cannibalize Lumia sales. However Elop is paranoid and desperate.
If the Pureview camera is running ios or Android it would be a killer product. Even WP7.5 would get a boost out of it. But Symbian (cough, cough) is a sunset OS.
If you want an excellent camera phone the N8 is really good enough. The price is right too, less than RM1000 now. Sure, it looks outdated and you probably want to hide it from your friends but it gets the job done. It even has an FM transmitter.
To me the dream phone is not the Pureview camera and MeeGo, it is the N8 camera and MeeGo. The Pureview is too much camera for a phone. If you really want such quality you would bring a DSLR. A camera phone is mainly for casual shots where quality isn't paramount. Like catching a pretty girl wearing a short skirt on a windy day.
Altough it's not running MeeGo, I'm still glad it's not Windows Phone OS. I believe many Symbian owners are glad too, and for those Andorid users who are looking for flexibility, freedom, customization, they'll be glad that it isn't WP. Although there're some that said they hope it's a WP, but most likely they don't know about WP restrictions and limitations or even used one, they just want WP because it's the newer OS (as usual, general perception = new is better, old is outdated).If the Pureview camera is running ios or Android it would be a killer product. Even WP7.5 would get a boost out of it. But Symbian (cough, cough) is a sunset OS.
If you want an excellent camera phone the N8 is really good enough. The price is right too, less than RM1000 now. Sure, it looks outdated and you probably want to hide it from your friends but it gets the job done. It even has an FM transmitter.
To me the dream phone is not the Pureview camera and MeeGo, it is the N8 camera and MeeGo. The Pureview is too much camera for a phone. If you really want such quality you would bring a DSLR. A camera phone is mainly for casual shots where quality isn't paramount. Like catching a pretty girl wearing a short skirt on a windy day.
To me, Symbian is still a better and proper smartphone OS, with better contacts management, support for 3G Video Calls, etc. It's working FINE for a smartphone. It needs to work on the notifications and it's lacking apps. If there is decent apps available, I would favor it over Android. Both Symbian and Android are good competition against each other and alternatives for one another, as both have the flexibility, customizations, etc.
For Symbian owners, their best alternatives would be Android as WP will be a major lockdown and loosing a lot of features. Similarly, if Android users want to move to Nokia, their best alternative will be Symbian, OS wise, not talking about apps.
N8 is good, but it's camera performance isn't so. I have sold the N8.
Have you tried the 808 PureView? I'm actualy very surprised and shock when I see one of the video; It's sooo smooth and fast, and the zooming also smooth unlike conventional zoom with the juddering. The focusing speed is a fast. Finally the video and audio recording is simply amazing. I went and test out briefly at Nokia Store, the camera performance is indeed very smooth and fast, N8 is slow and laggy, AF speed is also slow. I would say the 808 is quite a major improvement over the N8, personally. Moreover, when I shot at full resolution 38MP, I zoom in maximum, it's still sharp albeit there is noise at higher ISO, but still sharp. I'm actually very impressed, but I'm not really sure on the low light performance as the Nokia Store isn't really low light.
This is the video:
Jun 11 2012, 05:27 PM

Quote

0.0637sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled