QUOTE(KennyKB @ Mar 26 2012, 08:46 PM)
In terms of user interface MeeGo is the most elegant I've experienced. It is simple and intuitive, yet powerful and satisfying. Unlike Android or ios you can close an app easily or send it to the back by just a swipe. For Android and ios you may be not be sure if it is closed or still running in the background taking up RAM and CPU. You have to constantly press the task button to check. And all you see is a list of apps unlike MeeGo where you can see a snapshot of all the apps being multitasked.
I think the reason why the swipe UI is so appealing is the way it mimics real life. You double tap on the lockscreen like knocking on a door to open it. You swipe down to close an app like closing a curtain. You swipe to the right to send an app to the background like flipping away a card to another pile. You swipe the screens around like flipping the pages of a book. You can swipe a screen partially from the edge and peek at what's underneath before letting it spring back. It's like pulling the curtains partially to have a peek before letting it fall back. This sort of mimicry of the physical world is very satisfying unlike pressing buttons here and there.
Yes, MeeGo is unique and easily outbeat Android and iOS, it has the potential. What it's lacking is basically just on the applications and games (and the fact that it's ANNOUNCED being abandon before it's launch; weird right? Sounds fishy). Since it's Nokia own OS, they can easily enhance and add more things. Symbian user transition will be easier and it's an UPGRADE. Plus, from the response since last time, MeeGo has been positive, but Windows Phone has been negative since before it's launch. It may have gain other NEW comers who are into Windows Phone, but it's at the risk of loosing the old. If MeeGo 1st version is already so great, imagine the next version as they put in more flexibility, customization and so on.
But from my experience, management decision is no longer looking at low levels or entire picture, with many levels, they see statistics, market study, "marketing" and "presentation", "figures", not so much on the details anymore. That's why things changed and it's harder to meet customer's demand and needs. The people to do the market study, presents, etc must be well informed and knows every details, if not, most of the time, the result/outcome will be different.
I do agree very much on the multi-task view, it's the same like N900. N900 has not button in front screen, it's just like N9. Since it doesn't utilize swipe gesture, it always have a button on the top left on the screen (not hardware button). For those app/games that hides the button, you can use ctrl+backspace. The swipe gesture will be more simple and easy for most people, but for me, both has it's pros and cons; Sometimes swipe can be a disturbance when you didn't actually want to swipe, other than that, it's a very nice feature. When using Lumia 800, I keep double-tapping trying to unlock (natural behavior), and at time's try to swipe an application away; pressing and holding the back button is not so convenient, sometimes I pressed the windows button instead;
But the Metro Panorama UI for Windows Phone is a nice feature, putting everything in 1 level and we will be flicking/swiping left and right as well.
Anyway, I don't think Nokia will be going back to MeeGo; even if they want to later, I'm not sure if they can get back the team or gain back their trust, etc. Plus, it's not the first time already.
For Windows Phone, if to compare against Android and iOS. I do prefer Windows Phone, although it lacks flash; but overall, it's actually CAN BE better compared with the other 2, if only they remove the restrictions and limitations, reach out to more customers. Features and Functions can be added in later versions, but the restrictions and limitations is depending whether they want to open up or become like Apple.
Potential is there.
QUOTE(nicholasbeh @ Mar 26 2012, 11:47 PM)
today i use back my N9 again.left the 800 in the drawer collect dust.first thing i do is seriously look at the outlook/design,its reli LENG!!(although 800 got similar design but i hate the 3 buttons and lack of front cam).secondly tried double type on the screen then swipe to unlock the screen.now,a very serious question pop up in my mind again-why the Elop abandoned this os and claimed it is a dead os????even after a year from the announcement of adopting WP7,i still cant accept it.meego has great potential in the future,one of the best os(fully open source yet so simplify,easy to use).hardly to accept the fact elop abandoned this platform.aiks.
The one biggest suspicion is, because he's from Microsoft.
There're many weird reason:
1. Why need to drop other OS (somemore is homemade), why they can't be multi-platform?
2. MeeGo is drop because by end of 2011, only have 1 MeeGo device. But then, Windows Phone got difference? Only got 2 device only in 2011. They can have 2 MeeGo also device if they want. His reasons doesn't sound valid or make sense to me.
3. If need to adapt new OS, shouldn't they listen to Customers demand? What is most Customers been asking for?
Android. Android. Android. If Nokia have Android OS phone, they could potential grab quite a big part of the market? Many Symbian users switch to Android, imagine if Nokia have Android device, these people may still be using Nokia.
3.1 Those that switch to Android and have invest, etc. It's hard for them to change again. But IF Nokia have Android, they can easily switch back to Nokia, and Nokia can gain back their market of users.
4. If they (I mean Elop) want Windows Phone badly, They can still have Windows Phone, but why not go multi-platform as mentioned above. Even Samseng, HTC, etc also have Windows Phone, but comparing with Android, the sales is so much difference. But if you have both, you can decide which to produce more and remain in the business.
5. Why announce Symbian death and MeeGo death even before their Windows Phone is ready, and when they don't even know if their Windows Phone can sell, how the public will take it, how well it will do?
A simple theory is open 2 tap water, see which flows more; but his strategy seems, closing current tap water, while the new one still not ready and not sure if it can flow or not. Very confident.
Perhaps because Samseng, HTC, etc. they adapt the 2 tap water, seems Android tap water is flowing a lot, and Windows Phone is not really flowing, end up they produce and concentrate on Android.
Learning from this, they have to make sure the next one who take up Windows Phone, must put Windows Phone in priority. So... Nokia?
This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 27 2012, 09:31 AM