Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Full P3-21A Specs and Info!

views
     
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 07:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(razkal @ Feb 15 2012, 04:18 PM)
Yerp..i.ve read that the punch CVT cant handle more than 205nm torque. If they use different gearbox, the power might be higher. Cause like you said. It was built within the limit of the gearbox. 

But i guess it's better for proton cause now they start to compare with BMW. lol
*
torque is torque . power is power mah.. torque stay at 200nm and power can increase to 150bhp right?
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 08:00 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Feb 15 2012, 04:21 PM)
er....turbo = rm10000, and a lot problem tongue.gif

so now u see a lot 308thp for sale biggrin.gif
*
many of the pug range use same solution 1.6t engine.. later if want to buy can get cheap or not?
i remember my 407 2L engine rock solid only electronics glitchy.. the turbo one..got intermittent power, scary.. sweat.gif

ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 08:05 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(xshiro @ Feb 15 2012, 05:26 PM)
those car under 10secs, not solely because engine power, but gear ratio also important

with cvt, cant expect much
*
as you said gear ratio is important, so CVT acterly takes care of the problem but maybe different cvt gives different results.. ideally maximum acceleration and fuel saving from a given engine is best extracted from the engine with CVT thats why hybrid use cvt.. but then different makes produce different results kua..


Added on February 15, 2012, 8:06 pm
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Feb 15 2012, 08:02 PM)
yea, the only regrettable thing with 407 is 4 speed gearbox....because we prefer 5-6-7-8 tongue.gif

i test drove it, handling better than 308. high speed change lane feel so good. and the car wont feel under power. the car is really luxurious.
*
yeah gearbox not a joy to use.. and those time not many potong kereta handle AL4 so sked to trash it too much if it fail after waranty..
but i equipped my 407 with 18inch 225 tires, really a handling joy... thumbup.gif if only they brought in the 2.2 with 6speed auto..

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 08:06 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 09:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ben_panced @ Feb 15 2012, 09:24 PM)
no iafm, as the air intake has only 1 profile..
but it is equipped with cvvt on the intake side
*
i just sold the blm saga 2009 1.3auto, got tak tak tak sound the engine, is this that iafm thing causing it ar? vmad.gif
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 09:34 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(MR_alien @ Feb 15 2012, 09:32 PM)
if u follow saga BLM club
that "tak tak" sound is just an annoying sound from IAFM
doesn't mean the IAFM is faulty or broken
something small inside is causing that noise...forgot what name
the IAFM is working perfectly...just the annoying noise only
*
can it be claimed under waranty or how much this thing cost to repair.. i dowan diesel sounding proton.. laugh.gif

anyway sold liao..
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 09:44 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 09:41 PM)
u cant just simply separate torque and power coz they have direct relationship for a rotating shaft..go figure bro icon_rolleyes.gif
*
well he's talking about low to medium torque figure, which is actually low to medium rpm power. while when we talk about power, it refers to max rpm power the engine can produce.
it'll be foolish to think 205nm max torque is produced at 138bhp so go figure. smile.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 09:44 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 09:46 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(mezzi-quan @ Feb 15 2012, 09:44 PM)
rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif .........lol......quite complicated ar.......haha
*
no so, imagine vtec is 2 step, while the other is many many fine step.. biggrin.gif
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 09:54 PM)
Err..i dont get it bro..can u elaborate more, TQ notworthy.gif
*
hard to explain in words cos power is not a direct measurement, it's measured figure derived from torque measurement of a rotating crankshaft.

a simple example
user posted image

u see 2 curves, the torque curve doesnt peak at high rpm, while the power curve peaks at high rpm..

to get this curve, only torque (orange) is measured, power (blue) curve is derived from calculation of the torque x rpm

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 10:05 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(ben_panced @ Feb 15 2012, 10:06 PM)
this  notworthy.gif ..
*
since i brought the curve out, easier to explain 1 step further.. if you look at max torque lets say at 4000rpm, the power is only 60-70% of the maximum power at 6000rpm..

so ideally with CVT, while you are at 4000rpm with normal gearbox trying to rev to 6000rpm, CVT will already allow you to stay at 6000rpm, making it 30% more power at that instant, that's why it's the most effective way to unlock all the power from your engine and will provide the best acceleration curve of the car..
of coz the downside is the dreaded rubberband effect, engine rev shoot up, while car barely moving.. laugh.gif so the behaviour of the CVT changing ratio software according to load conditions also need to come into play and need to be smart, so that people dun get buzzed out the ears when driving CVT car.. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 10:14 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:14 PM)
Err i dont know how u interpret my statement early becoz this is what i mean..power is dependent on torque and RPM smile.gif
SOS
*
your source said this, which i already said. rpm is measured, torque is measured. power is calculated or derived from those 2. i already said it above. dun understand any further need to do engineering course.. smile.gif
QUOTE
    POWER (the rate of doing WORK) is dependent on TORQUE and RPM.
    TORQUE and RPM are the MEASURED quantities of engine output.
    POWER is CALCULATED from torque and RPM,



Added on February 15, 2012, 10:19 pm
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:14 PM)
Err i dont know how u interpret my statement early becoz this is what i mean..power is dependent on torque and RPM smile.gif
SOS
*
oh forgot, earlier discussion, i mention let torque be 200nm and power increase to 150bhp right? that's different situation cos there is turbo element mah.. you can control the boost which affects torque and power.

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 10:19 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:27 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:22 PM)
thats why previously i said u cant separate those power and torque for rotating shaft..they are dependent nod.gif btw, i'm already a mechanical eng. n done the ICE course rolleyes.gif
*
why cannot seperate the 2 condition, both condition is at different rpm wot.
i said set the conditon at mid range rpm, boost until 200nm, while power at high rpm can increase to 150bhp, obviously by boosting the torque at that high rpm..

i didn't say 200nm at 150bhp at 6000rpm


Added on February 15, 2012, 10:30 pm
QUOTE(h4dRi @ Feb 15 2012, 09:58 PM)
but then they will have to up the rev limit, and reduce the reliabilty
*
u have a point about reliability but then if a turbo 1.6L doing 150bhp should not be really stressful cos for other brand of turbo engines mah not even 100bhp per litre.. if not reliable then have to redesign the engine lor.. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 10:30 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:35 PM)
back from this CFE engine..their aim is torque thats why the feedback loop base on their torque..back to basic, why u need more power since in the end u need to burn more gas for it since u got same torque in the end..conservation of energy laugh.gif power is work or energy in the given time.
*
having more power is at standby only mah.. on demand when you need it.
if you don;t need that, then just rev to medium rpm, max torque lor.. as you know, max torque, the power isn't 100% it;s around 60-70% only wat.. have 30% more on standby is useful but doesnt mean you dont need to use rev to 6k rpm everytime.
its like why drive a 2L car when 1.5L can pull you point A to B? more power standby at your pedal mah.. not to say need to rev all the way when driving right?
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 10:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:43 PM)
more accurate to use torque..155hp lancer GT oso use cvt wat whistling.gif


Added on February 15, 2012, 10:44 pm
ok bro..u can tailored it yourself and call it CFE code AR188 laugh.gif JK
*
haha, and in honor of a fellow engineer who likes crazy frog.. tailor made malaysian car..

user posted image

brows.gif laugh.gif


Added on February 15, 2012, 10:50 pm
QUOTE(tonitoni @ Feb 15 2012, 10:43 PM)
more accurate to use torque..155hp lancer GT oso use cvt wat whistling.gif
yes gearbox is usually see torque figure, but power does come in due to rpm, not every gearbox can tahan 8000rpm at say 300nm,... hence got power limitation also.. biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 10:50 PM
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 11:11 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(779364 @ Feb 15 2012, 11:01 PM)


On a side note, CVT is not the best transmission to use if you want best 0-100 km/h acceleration time. I hate the mundane 1-tone noise of a CVT. Prefer either a manual or autobox with tiptronic
*
theoretically it is.. because during 0-100 it's the only gearbox that doesnt drop rpm like normal fix ratio gearbox i.e. maintain full power of the engine throughout the 0-100 duration. of cos in reallife cvt also got many types.. some good some so so..
ar188
post Feb 15 2012, 11:14 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Feb 15 2012, 11:12 PM)
looking at the fragile nature of CVT gearbox....0-100 best done in other ppl's car biggrin.gif
*
that's why you get one that can tahan ratings of 3.5L power/torque but used on 2L.. biggrin.gif then will not shred to pieces so easily..


Added on February 15, 2012, 11:15 pm
QUOTE(V12Kompressor @ Feb 15 2012, 11:13 PM)
perhaps its due to the weight difference. hmm.gif
The Sylphy is a lighter car than the Inspira BTW. Almost 100kg lighter.

mundane sound of engine? Let your own foot to decide what engine note you want to hear then.
*
that is quite true but today the inspira chasing c200 video the engine like bee buzzing sound.. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by ar188: Feb 15 2012, 11:15 PM
ar188
post Feb 17 2012, 05:45 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Feb 17 2012, 05:30 PM)
wait till mid of march, all will be answered
*
but i tot the photo come out already? won't be different 1month later.. biggrin.gif
ar188
post Feb 17 2012, 05:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(turbocharged @ Feb 17 2012, 05:49 PM)
maybe add some sticker or decal it will be nicer biggrin.gif
*
with sticker, then sure increase 100bhp biggrin.gif
ar188
post Feb 17 2012, 10:56 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(jw_92 @ Feb 17 2012, 10:55 PM)
the vios is a boring boring car that was produced from 2005 until now.. i cant believe its still moving so many units a month.. malaysian buyers.. sigh
*
why u care what others buy wor? your car now very exciting ar? biggrin.gif
ar188
post Feb 18 2012, 07:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Boy96 @ Feb 18 2012, 06:21 PM)
Just spotted two p3-21a in ayer keroh r&r petronas today, pictures later upload..
*
thanks for the pics.. looking at the silhouette doesnt look that attractive shape like the concept. much taller h. city like..
ar188
post Feb 18 2012, 07:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
9,206 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
QUOTE(Boy96 @ Feb 18 2012, 07:32 PM)
Ya, I tak sempat wanna run to them, by the time I did they left edy..
*
oh, so the pictures are a series of shots of them rushing to drive away from u? biggrin.gif

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0489sec    0.44    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 03:42 AM