does anyone know the latest price of SGS2 (ori SME)
doesn't matter G or non G..

Thanks

Almost **anything** look nice when naked.!! ~~LOL~~

~~@ TheLaptopDudeGuy
Not speaking on behalf Uncle Benny or fallenangelz but my GNex still on stock roms. No root or custom roms. Pure vanilla ICS 4.0.2 and like i said before it's sluggish and the volume sound an old sick grandma. Too damn slow even with Volume + app installed. Maybe things will improve when receive upcoming updates. Who knows.?
Or maybe root it and put custom kernel/roms will improve this things but as Uncle Benny and fallenangelz said, their phone also quite sluggish. Or is it because all of us had used the blazing fast SGSII before so we find GNex with ICS is a little letdown.

It sluggish in term of speed, not smoothness. GNex is smooth alright. On that Google earn their credit. But with same 1.2Ghz dual cores (though different processor) GNex should be as snappish as SGSII :-(
~~just my two cents~~

Ok guys jkay 13.6.1 for xwla4 deodexed is out!!!

Unfortunatly i am going to sleep, and GC is already sleeping.. GC and me have 6 hours time diff

Tomorrow morning we will start releasing stuff..

Transition smoothness/GUI smoothness is just a perception many people have.

I find that a launcher's developer would be able to optimise GUI smoothness if they wanted to.

I rather have speed over smoothness too because if its slow its slow.
I have a milestone on CM7 that's smooth, but slow when opening apps.

But can't help it if the RAM and processor speed is ..z.

On the other hand, the SGS that I had, was smooth and relatively fast.
Even though the GUI would occasionally be jerky, now with MIUI and Golauncher it is smooth and snappy.

User experience for that is much better than original, darky or even CM7.

My everyday phone however is the SGS2, and although the only tweak I've done to it was to flash speedmod kernel.

Using golauncher, the GUI is smooth and the experience is fast. Although 'fast' is a relatively subjective term, it loads apps and websites quick enough for me to feel good using it.

A lot of my friends who complain about a phone being slow, etc. I will bring out my milestone and tell them that 'slow' isn't the right term, but rather choppy.

What do I feel about my stock GNex.??
Quite disappointed actually. Maybe it because of my high expectation on a fast, powerful and awesome latest Google phone. Still, I had no regret buying this phone as I believe it will matured in coming times. But until that times come, it will be sitting inside the box as i prefer using SGSII for daily usage while GNote as a secondary phone when i have some leisure times.  :-)

But it has awesome screen..!! Beat SGSII hand down in screen category ~~LOL~~

I don't find any significant difference in G Nexus screen vs SGS II. Frankly I still prefer SGS II display over the G Nexus

head to head comparison
(my own 2cents, multiple by 25 then it will be 50cents  )
1. in terms of comfortable on hand:
GalNex>SGSII>GalNote (all naked)

2. in terms of screen attractiveness:
GalNote>SGSII>GalNex (if u din go compare the pixel shits, SGSII's screen will give u a fake impression.

3. in terms of camera quality:
GalNote>SGSII>GalNex. however zero lag shutters and the modded Camera ICS that can enable silent shutter makes it my favourite, if u get wat i mean   

4. in terms of transition animation smoothness:
GalNote>SGSII>GalNex. seriously wtf is wrong with GalNex's transition animation?

5. browsing experience: (all using stock browser)
GalNote>GalNex>SGSII. well bigger is better, and the reason GalNex is edging over SGSII is because ICS's browser is better than GB's.

6. ergonomy of use:
GalNex>SGSII>GalNote. my palm too small 

7. gaming:
GalNote>SGSII=GalNex. GalNex wins in terms of compatibility, but dun have samsung appstore or games hub make me so sad 

8. battery life:
this one no need compare. GalNote wins it all. but standby power preserving i can say GalNex is better than SGSII. but when on actual usage i feel that SGSII can last longer compare to GalNex 

9. navigation
GalNex wins like hell. while using GalNote i need to wait around 10 secs for gps to trace my location, but on GalNex its like almost instant. SGSII? :yaoming's face:

10. storage
this one no need compare la, GalNex is not in the same league to play.

11. connectivity
GalNote>SGSII>GalNex
while NFC is not widely used yet and i'm too lazy to dig out my BH505 from the hell packs of boxes, GalNex's wifi direct pissed me off. the function is there, but cannot initiate nor get connected. i dun noe wat's going on but seems like everyone is having the same issue. btw tried connect my GalNote with MHL+HDMI and play asphalt 6 on my home's toshiba 42", works like charm 

conclusion: GalNote really stands out. SGSII and GalNex dun have much diff. both have their pros n cons. only when SGSII got the official ICS and GalNex's ICS version is stabled then oni can compare again. but once u tried GalNote on ur hand, u'll nvr head back for smaller screens.
feel free to challange my conclusion, afterall usage pattern and preference is different from one to another.

SGSII last time is on andromeda, latest before i sold it.
GalNex is on maguro build updated last week.
GalNote is on LA6, latest firmware.

and while i'm not sure yet the devices u had tested is running which firmware and izit really got difference, sometimes i will also notice some lag especially while playing HD games. and i jz press the home button and back to the home screen, check the tast manager and din do anything, then back to the game and its smooth d.

pinch to zoom: yes on GalNote. no on GalNex. i dun think any of us will use the pinch to zoom function on homescreen though. not practical and in fact no meaning at all to me.

navigate thru app drawers: GalNote no lag, GalNex got lag. i got 14 pages of apps on my GalNote and only 3 pages on GalNex. and yet GalNex lags. i duno this is the problem of ICS or wat but seriously, F***.

milestone 3 is like aosp custom rom. with a freaking ugly pink unicorn boot animation.     

yup i love this feature very much, but i also miss the call/sms feature in contact list (swipe left=sms, swipe right=call)

What talk you..!!?? I thought all this while you're using white AP non-G set (bought from bebeq) same like me.?

---

Added on February 16, 2012, 1:28 pm

There's nothing extraordinary with the blardy ICS ~LOL~
You can close app in GNex by swipe it away but in SGSII on GB, it's much easier by using Task Manager.
One touch can close all active apps :-P

Actually what I'm keen to find out is the effectiveness of these Powerbanks in charging our SGS2...

For example, if I have a 4400maH Yoobao, does it mean that I can charge our SGS2 1650 mah (from zero to 100%) two times...ie 1650 x 2 = 3300maH... still less than 4400mah.

Does it work like that?

Or a fully charged 4400maH Yoobao will never be able to charge our SGS2 1650mah from 0% to 100%?

Thanks for any advice from those who have experience with these Powerbanks...

seriously we nid those external charger because it is portable enough to be cary around but that@@ who will even wan to carry one of this when he is travelling==

i would say even a 11200 mAh Yoobao is enough to hold ur day trip, taking that is like extending ur wall plug from home  , but anyway the more the better is what human prefer haha

Me

Support for LA4 And a few new features. Check the thread

Created Colored Circle Battery too (green:100-31, yellow 30-16, red 15-0)
* Added one more row of sliders to AOSP lockscreen (now 4 rows)
* Added Wi-Fi hotspot quick panel toggle
* Added the 4 power buttons (reboot, recovery, download and power off) to quick panel too (by request!)
* Fixed bug when 'Screen on' quick panel toggle was enabled at boot (would FC SystemUI)
* Fixed a bug on AOSP Deluxe lockscreen at screen off

Leo said it was a great base for CR

if i do that, will my apps n settings all go missing?