All About Harddisk Thread V4
All About Harddisk Thread V4
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
Huuuhuuu, price better drop. Running out of space now. Too much downloads and photos. Anyway, can anyone guide me on the most cost-effective way to have a central point to save all my things. Should I get NAS or should I get a Home Server or should I get a server? Pros & cons. Thanks lots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 19 2012, 03:04 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
Wondering if it's better to get 3TB external or 3TB internal? It's for keeping photos and stuffs. Purely storage purpose. Thanks.
|
|
|
Jul 21 2012, 02:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
Which is a safer way of storing photos? In a HDD in a computer or an External HDD? Thanks.
|
|
|
Jul 21 2012, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
QUOTE(dma0991 @ Jul 21 2012, 03:31 PM) There is no safest way to store valuable data, this is because there is just too many factors to take into account that can kill the HDD. First level, do a RAID 1 Mirror with two HDD which reduces the chance of HDD premature death but doesn't prevent the possibility of both HDDs dying which can happen in a lightning strike for example. Second level, do a third backup in an external HDD along with the RAID 1 mentioned earlier to overcome the problem mentioned earlier but then there is another problem, what if your house catches on fire? Argh, ok. 4 HDD in total. Wow. Ok. Doomsday will kill all 4 copies sadly. Third level, do what I've already mentioned in first and second level, and do a fourth backup in an external and store it elsewhere that is not your house. That is as safe as it gets for a consumer but to consider 100% safe isn't likely, I bet there is a 0.00001% chance that all will die from whatever cause and you'll still lose your data. Anyway, WD3TB is reliable? |
|
|
Jul 23 2012, 10:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
I purchased the Seagate Barracuda 2TB and 3TB yesterday. And my Windows is installed into an SSD I got yesterday. SSD is awesome. The HDD is so far so good too.
|
|
|
Jul 23 2012, 09:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,475 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: KL |
QUOTE(everling @ Jul 23 2012, 02:30 PM) You bought them despite the article I had linked reporting that the Seagate Barracuda XT 3 TB had a failure rate of 9.70% and the Seagate Barracuda XT 2 TB had a failure rate of 7.53%? You are a brave man but kudos for sticking to your favourite brand. While I have little doubt that the data in the article is good, it also isn't a world-wide representative nor does it account for changes over time. Argh, damn it. I merely glanced through that webpage then I went to the shop and the shop people told me they recommend Seagate more than WD so I took Seagate instead. I totally forgot about the data. I wish you luck. Actually I realise I have 1x 320GB Seagate Barracuda running in my comp. Previously, it was used in a file server running 24/7. Then after they defunct the server, I took it and used it on my comp again running 24/7. It has been running for quite a number of years now and still working very well. |
| Change to: | 0.0430sec
0.78
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 25th November 2025 - 06:47 PM |