QUOTE(cherroy @ Jul 18 2012, 04:17 PM)
At first, I used to think SSD has no moving part, it should be significant reliable than HDD, and this is many people perception as well, I reckon
But to my disappointment, after reading many complaint about SSD, and search through, SSD also subjected to failure as well despite no moving parts in it.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-re...ate,2923-3.htmlSSD failure % can be on par with HDD as well.
Just HDD being mass use around, that's why we see many complaint about dead HDD.
For eg. There are 500 million of HDD in the market, a 1% failure means we see 5 million dead HDD, and complaints around.
While there may be only 1 million of SSD, even at failure rate of 2%, we only see 20k dead SSD.
5 million dead HDD vs 20k SSD, the figure look huge difference, but it doesn't say SSD is more reliable or not.
And the reason for those failures are... surprise; firmware issues.
Sandforce controllers has been notorious for their BSODs, it's not on a hardware layer either it is more towards the firmware. So, techcnically it has nothing to do with the hardware.
Intel can create reliable firmware for their Sandforce based SSDs (330 and 520).
That article is over a year old, and over the last year the SSD market and industry has changed considerably.
That being said, we do need another 2-3 years to tell if SSDs are as reliable as HDDs or not. Intel's first generation X-25 SSDs are still running strong today.