QUOTE(BlackWoods @ Jul 19 2012, 09:34 AM)
I don't know if SSD is more reliable or not, but the price it is selling now is simply too expensive.
Is that extra speed worth so much money? I don't think so, personal opinion though.
Don't you mean the price of buying it is too expensive?
It's not about the sequential read/write performance, which is only about 3x or 4x the best that HDDs can offer. It is the access times, which is about 0.1ms and extremely fast compared to HDD's +10ms times; about 100x difference. For operations that involves tons of random reads and writes, like when on boot, SSDs are very responsive. If it takes you long minutes to boot up or do a virus scan that you would like to reduce by a lot, SSDs can do it.
QUOTE(DarkNite @ Jul 19 2012, 10:24 AM)
They dun make 'em to last anymore!
My Seagate 80GB IDE hdd from 2002 is still functioning!
This make me think about SSD, able to last that long even with no moving parts?

It is more of a QC issue. Theoretically, the NAND storage is good for at least ten years. Most of the failures at this time, isn't related to the actual NAND storage. Most of it is probably due to firmware, manufacturing defects or poor QC.