Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.14, Nikon D4 $6000 only
|
|
 Mar 1 2012, 08:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
 
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009  
|
futuromic offered 2 years warranty, ut i heard that if choosing tamron, u should do a test at the shop to get the sharp copy, some reported getting soft image while some highly recommended it as sharp.
any tips? O.O |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 08:46 PM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
i heard theres a chart but...
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 11:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
um.. anyone used tamron 17-50 here? mind to share some of the output from the lens...? >__<
|
|
|
Mar 1 2012, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(makaroni @ Mar 1 2012, 11:33 PM) eh.. thats sigma o.o, i thought it selled around 1.3k for new?QUOTE(Andy214 @ Mar 1 2012, 11:34 PM) Here's some, but then you can achieve this with other lens anyway. The advantage is you can have constant f/2.8 aperture which is useful for low light. andy, hows the image compared to kitlens? » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You can view more samples from this website: http://www.pixel-peeper.com/  |
|
|
Mar 3 2012, 02:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
now i am confused further, between a prime 35mm or 17-50 tamron non vc. given i only had 1.2k to spend and no lens atm.. this going to be my first lens
 |
|
|
Mar 3 2012, 05:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Mar 3 2012, 02:34 PM) still 17-50. really?QUOTE(ojtee @ Mar 3 2012, 02:39 PM) nothing to be confused about, the 2 lens different specifics thank for the input, i guess 17-50 will suit me best. i sorta have a knack into fashion / portraiture. atm only had the body only without lens ;(1. 35mm - faster, good low lite speed,good general FL, has good IQ 2. 17-50mm - wider range FL, good if you are into landscape and can equal a portrait lens you didnt mentioned what kind of photograpghy you are into, so you will only get a generalized use of the elnses, I believe you have a kitlens, so the 35mm would probably be a good addition to it, else get the 17-50mm now the problem continues as i know the 17-50 had 2 version, either with VC or wihout? i am using d90 body btw..  This post has been edited by Sadru: Mar 3 2012, 05:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2012, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
50mm 1.8g really bokeliciousss.. must... resist.....!!
|
|
|
Mar 25 2012, 04:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
guys, whats the standard price for MB-D80 second hand?
shoud i go for the original or maybe third party such as photix would be sufficient enough? |
|
|
Mar 25 2012, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(hidden830726 @ Mar 25 2012, 12:57 PM) k i can help, 35 not so bokeh, compare 50, so out. thank you, it make my mind at peace 1.8 and 1.4 suppose 1.4 better bokeh. But i would advise to get 50 1.8G instead. why not take both 35 and 50? use PRIME only   |
|
|
Mar 25 2012, 09:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(Beanie2304 @ Mar 25 2012, 09:21 PM) I'm one of the member of media which covering this concert under Kaggregate Media. I'm somewhat a photojournalist here. =) omg, i might saw you there Yea, those "extras" are so irritating that day. But at least it was taken out by bokeh!  Girls' Generation in Twin Towers @live 2012 by beaniewhut, on Flickr Aww yeaaaaa!  |
|
|
Mar 26 2012, 07:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
many news regarding the d4 iso performance atm.
guys, anyone had any experiences with 18-70 nikkor lens? i had my eye on them but wondering would it worth it? This post has been edited by Sadru: Mar 26 2012, 07:22 PM |
|
|
Mar 27 2012, 10:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
|
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Mar 27 2012, 10:23 PM) Wow at the details... damn scary the details.. omaigod maybe this one is the E version?  ... *took ages for my Slowmyx to load it too * |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0540sec
 0.88
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 17th December 2025 - 09:39 PM |
Quote
