Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

TIME TIME Fibre Broadband™, 100 Mbps of wholesome goodness

views
     
steakikan
post Jul 11 2012, 09:57 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Hello? Can I ask some question?
I checked that there is a 12 month contract for Time fibre, is it true? Thanks
steakikan
post Aug 4 2012, 10:07 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Is there anyone suscribing to time fibre receiving the older WRT 120n router? I am being quote to receive the older model, not the e1000. Thanks
steakikan
post Aug 5 2012, 07:02 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
@jjj2
I will just about to register this coming monday, have emailed the CS regarding the registration. In the email, it is stated that I will be receiving the WRT120N. I will try to clarify with them again, but just want to find out anyone receiving the WRT120N and not the E1000.
steakikan
post Aug 6 2012, 12:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
@jjj2
Does Time Fibre allows dyndns to be used?
steakikan
post Aug 6 2012, 12:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
@rip_code

Thanks, shall explore more later
steakikan
post Aug 14 2012, 06:04 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Just finished the installation, question though for e1000
Anyone know how to disable the e1000 WPS, default firmware? Currently I disable the wifi to prevent wireless tapping.
steakikan
post Aug 14 2012, 09:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
1 1 ms <1 ms <1 ms CISCO04589 [192.168.1.1]
2 37 ms 38 ms 39 ms 203.121.30.1
3 76 ms 45 ms 159 ms 10.200.203.49
4 44 ms 42 ms 41 ms ge-3-0-7.glsfb02.icr.time.net.my [211.25.27.73]

5 43 ms 37 ms 42 ms ae-0-0.er-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [211.25.27.118
]
6 29 ms 33 ms 32 ms xe-2-1-0-0.cr-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.2.
57]
7 43 ms 41 ms 41 ms ae-2-0.br-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.5.126]

8 41 ms 39 ms 37 ms ae-1.edge-gw-2-cyberjaya-pip.my.globaltransit.ne
t [124.158.234.21]
9 39 ms 37 ms 34 ms ae-5.cr-gw-2-sin-pip.sg.globaltransit.net [61.11
.212.30]
10 44 ms 47 ms 48 ms ae-1.br-gw-1-sin-pip.sg.globaltransit.net [124.1
58.224.158]
11 239 ms 237 ms 232 ms 116.51.26.69
12 321 ms 250 ms 249 ms ae-2.r20.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.1
42]
13 233 ms 246 ms 239 ms ae-2.a00.sngpsi02.sg.ra.gin.ntt.net [116.51.16.2
50]
14 247 ms 249 ms 252 ms ge-0.ntt-inet-peer.sngpsi02.sg.ra.gin.ntt.net [1
16.51.17.10]
15 84 ms 86 ms 80 ms ge-1.starhub.br001.sgp02.ntt.com.sg [116.51.3.22
]
16 82 ms 82 ms 84 ms gi-5-1-0-an-ats-loc04.starhub.net.sg [203.118.5.
11]
17 83 ms 79 ms 79 ms 203.116.80.207

Trace complete.

Wow, there is some high ping there in between
steakikan
post Aug 15 2012, 07:30 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Morning Anomaly (slow download, fast upload)
user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

user posted image

Edit: New Speedtest
user posted image

This post has been edited by steakikan: Aug 15 2012, 08:44 AM
steakikan
post Aug 15 2012, 09:30 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009

Tracing route to 203.116.80.207 over a maximum of 30 hops

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms CISCO04589 [192.168.1.1]
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 210.19.112.1
3 3 ms 2 ms 3 ms 10.200.203.49
4 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 211.25.27.93
5 4 ms 2 ms 2 ms ae-2-0.er-01-glsfb.ni.time.net.my [211.25.27.114
]
6 11 ms 8 ms 6 ms xe-0-1-0-0.cr-02-glsfb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.2.
1]
7 9 ms 7 ms 8 ms xe-1-0-0-0.cr-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.2.
50]
8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms ae-2-0.br-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.5.126]

9 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms ae-1.edge-gw-2-cyberjaya-pip.my.globaltransit.ne
t [124.158.234.21]
10 10 ms 10 ms 10 ms ae-5.cr-gw-2-sin-pip.sg.globaltransit.net [61.11
.212.30]
11 14 ms 14 ms 14 ms ae-2.br-gw-1-sin-pip.sg.globaltransit.net [124.1
58.224.190]
12 10 ms 10 ms 9 ms 116.51.26.69
13 10 ms 10 ms 11 ms ae-0.r02.sngpsi02.sg.bb.gin.ntt.net [129.250.4.2
48]
14 10 ms 9 ms 10 ms ae-1.a00.sngpsi02.sg.ra.gin.ntt.net [116.51.16.2
46]
15 10 ms 11 ms 9 ms ge-0.ntt-inet-peer.sngpsi02.sg.ra.gin.ntt.net [1
16.51.17.10]
16 46 ms 46 ms 45 ms ge-1.starhub.br001.sgp02.ntt.com.sg [116.51.3.22
]
17 44 ms 44 ms 44 ms gi8-1-0-an-ats-loc04.starhub.net.sg [203.118.7.1
1]
18 45 ms 46 ms 46 ms 203.116.80.207


And
Tracing route to ir1.fp.vip.sp2.yahoo.com [72.30.38.140]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms CISCO04589 [192.168.1.1]
2 2 ms 2 ms 2 ms 210.19.112.1
3 2 ms 2 ms 3 ms 10.200.203.49
4 3 ms 2 ms 2 ms 211.25.27.93
5 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms ae-2-0.er-01-glsfb.ni.time.net.my [211.25.27.114
]
6 12 ms 7 ms 7 ms xe-0-1-0-0.cr-02-glsfb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.2.
1]
7 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms xe-1-0-0-0.cr-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.2.
50]
8 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms ae-2-0.br-01-csfcb.ni.time.net.my [223.28.5.126]

9 5 ms 3 ms 3 ms ae-1.edge-gw-2-cyberjaya-pip.my.globaltransit.ne
t [124.158.234.21]
10 195 ms 195 ms 195 ms ae-5.cr-gw-2-sin-pip.sg.globaltransit.net [61.11
.212.30]
11 195 ms 196 ms 195 ms ae-2.br-gw-1-lax-pip.us.globaltransit.net [124.1
58.224.18]
12 250 ms 195 ms 195 ms ge-0-1-0-0.pp-gw-1-lax-pip.us.globaltransit.net
[124.158.250.9]
13 195 ms 195 ms 196 ms yahoo.com.any2ix.coresite.com [206.223.143.195]

14 203 ms 202 ms 201 ms xe-5-1-1.pat2.sjc.yahoo.com [216.115.96.46]
15 203 ms 203 ms 203 ms ae-0-d171.msr2.sp1.yahoo.com [216.115.107.83]
16 204 ms 203 ms 202 ms et-17-1.fab3-1-gdc.sp2.yahoo.com [67.195.128.73]

17 203 ms 204 ms 203 ms po-11.bas1-3-prd.sp2.yahoo.com [76.13.244.9]
18 203 ms 268 ms 219 ms ir1.fp.vip.sp2.yahoo.com [72.30.38.140]

Seems some improvement in the time server
Hopefully it keeps getting better
steakikan
post Aug 16 2012, 07:06 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Quite ok in the morning, later try again at night
user posted image

steakikan
post Aug 16 2012, 06:11 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
I think will aggree on this one
user posted image

user posted image

And for comparison
KL
user posted image

Singapore (adsl upload speed??)
user posted image
Jakarta
user posted image
Sydney
user posted image

steakikan
post Aug 16 2012, 08:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Wow, what a bad experience

Mine is quite okay, only leave out a quite apparent hole unpatched.

edit:
Currently Downloading Visual Studio documentation at rate about 3.6-7.2mbps

This post has been edited by steakikan: Aug 16 2012, 08:47 PM
steakikan
post Aug 28 2012, 01:50 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Some speedmeter screenshot of 50Mbps

Attached Image

Attached Image

Attached Image


Actual Download from MSDN is about 10-20mbps...

Stability wise lately quite good, but ping to SF still quite bad, later try to speed test again

Hope it help, maybe u would like us to try speedtest?

steakikan
post Aug 30 2012, 12:37 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Hopefully those using old package can get the boost of 100mbps, wonder how fast it is hahahaha
steakikan
post Sep 1 2012, 11:50 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
If i understand what you mean, then, go to WAN setting in your tp-link, set it to receive DHCP then it should do (Reminder, set different IP class, simple, if your cisco is using 192.168.0.xxx range, your TP link must be in 192.168.1.xxx range)
But this approach is not recommended, as you will be creating 2 different network ip

Another one is W-AP switch mode, is by assigning your tp-link an IP address which outside DHCP of Cisco Router (e.g, if your DHCP pool start from 192.168.1.100, you can set TPlink at 192.168.1.50) in Default Gateway address, and just plug the cable from Cisco router in one of the LAN port, not the WAN (refer to the manual)

reff
http://www.ezlan.net/Wireless_Modes.html
http://www.dslreports.com/faq/11233

hope it helps
steakikan
post Sep 4 2012, 04:06 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Did they increase our current boost speed to 100mbps? If yes, which package got "Affected"?

edit: I saw the change in the speed and package subscription, so for us previously who uses 6mbps package, do we get free upgrade to 8mbps? Or we still stuck with 6mbps (frankly kinda unfair, because we pay more expensive)

This post has been edited by steakikan: Sep 4 2012, 04:10 PM
steakikan
post Sep 5 2012, 06:54 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Agree with ezinger, so how about those using old package? It is more expensive per bandwidth than the current one? Is there option to upgrade(or downgrade?)

steakikan
post Sep 5 2012, 09:05 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
@fireballs
I think astro one separate from time package, their package is quite different, i think its more of astro obligation, not time.

But then, why not, upgrade those from old package, it is kinda sad as the old package is more expensive (I think 6mbps is quite adequate, just that the price is quite expensive)

Please, upgrade old customer package!
steakikan
post Sep 5 2012, 04:20 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
@linkokkeen

Ur welcome, hopefully it helps, hahahha, still newbie oso on networking....
steakikan
post Sep 5 2012, 08:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
34 posts

Joined: Oct 2009
Which download are slow?
Mine still quite fine not much issue with download speed, anyway u can complain with speedtest proof if your speed is unstable (but not sure which speedtest they want you to test)


edit: I download from MSDN

This post has been edited by steakikan: Sep 5 2012, 08:44 PM

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0270sec    0.45    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 12:26 PM