Exclusive to AT&T. Nothing to look here.

Lumia 800 and 710 coming after CNY. Weird timing.

Everyone has their own preferences Some prefer smaller screen so use with 1 hand is easy, some prefer bigger screen so viewing stuff is easier.

Is google Talk and Yahoo Chat integrated?

Reviews for Lumia 900 are out.

All reviews from Anandtech, Engadget and so many other review sites said the 900's camera is great and awesome but fanboi Joshua Topolsky from The Verge just gotta hate on it.

All other reviews echo the same thought about Lumia 900's camera though - good, but not great. But only The Verge goes all the way to say that it's even worse than the Galaxy Nexus, famous for bad camera.

I would say that that is partially true. I agree with most, if not all of the things he said about the problems with Windows Phone. But that's the problem, he only states the problem of the WP OS and didn't even bother to talk about the great stuff about it.

Maybe he's just tired of repeating the same stuff after reviewing so many Windows Phone devices, then my suggestion is to have a completely separate review solely for the WP OS! Since they're all the same, right? There he can talk all day about its pros and cons, instead of dumping all the cons of WP on one review in the Lumia 900 and expect people to read reviews of other Windows Phones to get a sense what better features lies beneath!

Such a huge website but fails when it comes to having a better review system. Even Engadget has a separate review for Sense 4.0, and directs users reading the reviews for One X, S and V to that separate review since Sense 4.0 is the same across all One devices.

I feel that's just very irresponsible as a reviewer. Imagine a new user, see all the Lumia 900 ads, and want to read some reviews. So he goes to a 'reputable' site like The Verge and only see all the bad stuff about WP7. Since the person is a new and casual user, I doubt he will research further than that.

The reviewer's act can be forgived if he would provide a simple link to previous WP7 reviews... but alas...

Perhaps I used words that are too strong. I meant that Galaxy Nexus' camera can't match up with modern, top-of-the-line smartphones, even to its previous Samsung phone, the SII. Decent camera nonetheless, of course. But just not the one that you'll be looking in such a high-end phone.

"Now keep in mind, my daily driver is a Galaxy Nexus, which has a relatively poor camera — so this is significant. I went into the Lumia 900 expecting an excellent photo experience, but it's really simply mediocre."

By comparing L900 with the Nexus, and then saying it is 'significant', I have the impression that he's saying that the Galaxy Nexus is better. He didn't explicitly state it though, I could read it wrongly. No reason for him to say it is 'significant' otherwise IMO.

I don't interpret what he said that way because he's an experienced phone reviewer so he should be exposed to many other phones like the 4S with much better camera performance, so I don't think that he will find any phone camera difference significant, unless it is really significant.

But that's up to different interpretation anyway.

Malaysia logic:

1. Sirim sticker on iPhone 4/4s - no need.

2. Sirim sticker on Lumia - Let's put 2 of them there, right on the phone.