QUOTE(ZzZzz... @ Mar 6 2012, 02:38 PM)
Is 5D Mark II. I wonder why the tester use such a picture which is full with water droplets to test ISO. Don't have a cleaner picture?
Fujifilm X-Pro1/X-E1
|
|
Apr 1 2012, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,510 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Atlanta |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 08:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,510 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Atlanta |
|
|
|
Apr 5 2012, 02:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,510 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Atlanta |
QUOTE(seech @ Apr 5 2012, 09:33 AM) It's quite good actually. I think there are many who made those comments but haven't actually tried the MF on the XP1. Try it yourself and see what you think. Definitely works better than my X100 even with the 1.20 firmware update. Ok, sure will try it personally.In fact, Xpro1 do attracted me, just the lens selection is too little. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0256sec
0.72
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 08:32 PM |