GPU Discussion V2
|
|
 Jan 5 2012, 02:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor   
|
The example is pretty good. Continue with it? Now we need the Red Camp soon too.
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Jan 6 2012, 10:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 6 2012, 10:21 AM) Wah, God lee_what2004 has arrived haha Different GPU? Hmmm, now that is interesting.  Eh? I dint know the gt555m in the LG P330 is different as well haha~ XD  |
|
|
Jan 6 2012, 04:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Seems like an even more efficient architecture compared to the GF106 resulting in almost 10% improvement in benchmarks.
|
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 12:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Jan 6 2012, 11:56 PM) So its not a competitor to the m14x after all miahahaha Well it could be. A more efficient architecture compared to the M14x's GT555M can do wonders. |
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 10:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(astria @ Jan 7 2012, 09:17 PM)  and to think that GT 635M will have the same craziness... |
|
|
Jan 7 2012, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Oh different GPU again...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 8 2012, 01:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Finally an Intel IGP to look forward to?
Oh wait... realized it's paired with a monster of a CPU.  This post has been edited by AlexLai: Jan 8 2012, 01:32 AM |
|
|
Jan 12 2012, 08:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Just waiting for the time the GT640M and GT650M go mainstream.
|
|
|
Jan 15 2012, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Performance should be slightly lower and higher than the GTX560M for the GT640M and GT650M respectively.
|
|
|
Jan 17 2012, 02:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Those are still considered mainstream.
|
|
|
Jan 20 2012, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(lee_what2004 @ Jan 17 2012, 02:41 PM)  GTX660M@128-bit  QUOTE(soapmac @ Jan 19 2012, 10:03 PM) hello all. computer-world-new-comer here. im using Nvidia GeForce GT520M. Any comments, myths, facts that i should know? Nothing much about it, it's a decent entry level solution. Can play most games, just need to sacrifice on the details.[attachmentid=2648707]  oh well. im in class 3.  thought it was better.  |
|
|
Jan 27 2012, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Unless the game benchmarks prove that the 128-bit bus isn't a limitation, looks like I'm going back to supporting AMD this year.
|
|
|
Feb 9 2012, 08:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Feb 9 2012, 04:30 PM) ^ Uhh.. G210M only 64 bit, i don't think it's enough for medium gaming. Ain't the bus size that matters only, the G210M only has 16 SP but still pretty respectable.i thought XPS 1340 have dual graphic? try check bottom left of the GPU-Z windows.. there is a drop down selection. http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForc...0M.17638.0.html |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 13 2012, 09:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Not like you noticed that much difference also
|
|
|
Feb 15 2012, 01:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Feb 14 2012, 11:56 PM) GT635M in N45SL As suspected, total rebadge. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « GT555M in current N55SF (by Simon) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « No difference what so ever.  |
|
|
Mar 4 2012, 01:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Well that's a disappointment.
|
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Wao.. Nvidia surely giving a lot of surprises lately..
|
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 10:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
Doubt so but Kepler's architecture seems like a departure from Fermi more like.
I just wonder how real world performance would be with so many SP but on a low bus width. |
|
|
Mar 11 2012, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(Acid_RuleZz @ Mar 11 2012, 11:08 PM) From Acer brochure GT640M got over P6000++ in Vantage. For 3DMarks Vantage? That puts it in the upper GT555M region. This post has been edited by AlexLai: Mar 11 2012, 11:33 PM |
|
|
Mar 22 2012, 11:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
5,531 posts Joined: Feb 2009 From: Kajang, Selangor
|
QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Mar 22 2012, 09:36 AM) All in a 11.6" chassis? Don't be too certain. I'm already skeptical about that picture since the Intel logos for the Core-series are the first gen ones.Wow, that's some very serious claims there, looking forward to it!!  Thanks for sharing  |
| Change to: |  0.7126sec
 0.41
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 05:13 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.