QUOTE(rattan @ Jan 4 2012, 05:43 PM)
always thought the g version suppose to have a longer battery life then the non g version. even on GB 2.3.6 still camera fc ? Stock ROM ?
It's mixed bag.Some of the G models I tried have better battery life than non-G models & some don't.
I tested all the phones in same condition (stock rom,lowest brightness & no extra apps)
My friends said 2.3.6 reduced the camera fc but sometimes it'll happen again.
Both I9100 & I9100G is a good device with good collections of hardware.In term of hardware SGS II is still one of the best device around even though it was announced nearly 1 year ago.But the software side is bit questionable.Perhaps it's time for Samsung to concentrate improve on their software side now.
I know custom rom can clear some of Samsung's mess but as a device seller Samsung should deliver the best possible software by themselves.
QUOTE(iori57 @ Jan 4 2012, 06:13 PM)
ya i notice 80% people in this forum that report those problems are i9100G
another conclusion might be... for non G user most edi using custom rom, whereas G user mostly stock...
custom rom less problem compare to stock also a possibility..
maybe some G users with problems try flashing Super Rom for G version and report back whether less problems?
Not really.There are still some of the I9100 users around.Even with stock rom there's not much complaint from their side.
Correction : Well supported custom rom delivers better experience compared to stock rom.Rest of the custom rom which compiled noobly & with poor developer support will just give users more problem.