Nice review here
Turbocharged Proton Exora Bold tested
Short Review on the Exora Bold
Short Review on the Exora Bold
|
|
Dec 18 2011, 10:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 03:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(ZenGTMM @ Dec 19 2011, 01:36 AM) Good review bro. Looks like proton finally got it right. |
|
|
Dec 19 2011, 04:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(simonhar @ Dec 19 2011, 04:27 PM) Hi guys, the Exora Bold is pretty good, more powerful and looks better now. Check out my little review Nice review bro. I like white exora very much. Yea, the lack of chrome badge is a bit annoying. Looks like even proton is not confident with its own products.http://www.simonhar.com/2011/12/driven-pro...old-16-cfe.html |
|
|
Dec 26 2011, 11:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
I noticed that the torque curve of CFE in the range 1000-2000rpm rises linearly and significantly higher compared to CPS. I suppose the turbo starts working above 2000rpm. What causes the gain of torque in this range?
|
|
|
Dec 27 2011, 12:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2012, 07:48 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(huaren1978 @ Jan 10 2012, 06:31 PM) Finally we managed to find time to test drive the Exora Bold last weekend. Can say I couldn't stop smiling (or was it grinning from ear to ear?) all the way from start to finish. The torque was simply superb. We were pleasantly surprised with the short driving experience that we had. Bro, I know the turbo kick in at 2000rpm. How about the pickup below 2000rpm? let's say from 1000-1999rpm, is it same as normal cps or better in term of pickup? |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 10 2012, 08:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 10 2012, 10:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(huaren1978 @ Jan 10 2012, 10:14 PM) Say you're driving a normally-aspirated Exora CPS, would you consciously make an effort to keep the rpm below the 2000 mark while driving off when the lights turn to green? A commenter in paultan said he pressed hard on accelerometer and the car didn't really moved fast until it reached 2000rpm. So I guessed the pickup was weak below 2000rpm.I don't get your point actually. |
|
|
Jan 11 2012, 02:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
173 posts Joined: Aug 2006 |
QUOTE(k!nex @ Jan 11 2012, 12:26 AM) I beg to differ, by theory it should be worse than a normal 1.6 NA car. Reason, the engine compression ratio is lower compare to NA version.Turbo= 8.9:1 compare to NA= 10:1 . Thats the weakness of turbo, low end sux before the turbo start spooling. QUOTE(kadajawi @ Jan 11 2012, 01:30 AM) When it has CVT shouldn't it just raise the RPM above 2k whenever you try to accelerate hard? So, to compensate for the weaker low end pickup, manufacturers need to tune the engine so that turbo kicks in at lowest rpm possible. That way, the drivability is greatly increase. I see that VW, Peugeot and Ford can tune their turbo cars to kick in at <1600rpm VW Touran 1.4 TSI, 1.9 TDI and Ford Galaxy 1.6 TDCI had the same issue. No power before the turbo kicks in. But then it's nice This post has been edited by A2Z2U: Jan 11 2012, 02:36 AM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0378sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 2nd December 2025 - 10:50 AM |