Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V7

views
     
kokoronotomo
post Dec 31 2011, 08:34 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(WanMB @ Dec 28 2011, 12:56 AM)
How about South Korea? I heard Sukhoi offered them for their next generation fighter.
*
isn't Korea developing their own KFX?
kokoronotomo
post Dec 31 2011, 09:14 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
Indon buys, Australia buys better thumbup.gif
kokoronotomo
post Jan 11 2012, 08:49 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
Typhoon costs nearly £85,000 per hour fly!!!??? wtfff can buy house...while super tucano only £500 rclxub.gif

RAF urged to cut ‘Cold War’ new jets for cheap propeller aircraft

Tom Coghlan, Defence Correspondent
January 22, 2010
The RAF is under pressure to cut its multibillion-pound orders for fast jets in favour of cheaper propeller aircraft as part of a review of defence spending. The suggestion, from General Sir David Richards, has ignited a debate that pitches the head of the Army against his opposite numbers in the other two Services.
General Richards, Chief of the General Staff, believes that the Super Tucano offers a cost-effective alternative to fast jets such as the Cold War-era Eurofighter Typhoon in counter-insurgency operations such as those in Afghanistan. Resembling something from the Second World War, a Super Tucano costs about £5 million, a fraction of the £60 million estimated cost of the F35 Joint Strike Fighter ordered for the Royal Navy’s new aircraft carriers or the £67 million of a Typhoon.
A strategic defence review expected after the general election is likely to recommend that each Service’s budget is cut by about 20 per cent.
General Richards has argued that state-on-state confrontations will be largely replaced by counter-insurgency operations in the future, making huge savings possible if the Government is prepared to sacrifice ships and tanks for lighter and cheaper but technically advanced matériel.
Air analysts argue that the Tucano offers a cost-effective platform to which high-tech equipment and munitions can be attached. It is being considered by the US Navy after impressive performance in Colombia, where it is used against FARC rebels.
Paul Beaver, former editor of Jane’s Defence Weekly and a former army helicopter pilot, said: “What David Richards is saying is that the airframe does not need to be superb — you just need to put high-tech sensors and the defensive aids on there. In Afghanistan, there is a reasonably small threat level for aircraft. It is not a replacement for Apache helicopters but it is a complementary capability.” Richard North, a defence analyst and another advocate of the aircraft, said: “The right kit for the sort of wars we are fighting today is a lot cheaper than the high-end kit.”
The Brazilian two-seater Tucano can fly from airstrips and loiter for six and a half hours over the battlefield without refuelling, although it cannot refuel in mid-air. It can carry 1.5 tonnes and uses only £500 of fuel an hour. The Eurofighter Typhoon costs nearly £85,000 an hour to fly. The trainer version is in service with the RAF.
Andrew Brookes, aerospace analyst at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said: “I think that General Richards has been led astray by people who think that because it is cheap and cheerful it is the answer to the maiden’s prayer. In a Joint Strike Fighter you have a stealthy, magnificent intelligence-gathering platform. No one will see it coming and it could go to downtown Tehran, Pyongyang or maybe even Moscow tomorrow. You can say you would get a lot of Tucanos cheaply but the money for Typhoon and JSF has already been spent and they can be used for the whole spectrum of operations.”
One defence source told The Times: “We neither need, nor can afford the ‘deep persistent operating capability’ associated with attacking stealthily the most heavily defended airspace on Earth. Something like Tucano does the job for irregular warfare [of the future] and is effective and cost-efficient.”
An RAF spokesman said: “We are always seeking the most effective ways of conducting surveillance. The preferred option is currently to use fast jets and unmanned air vehicles because of their ability to stay airborne longer [through air-to-air refuelling] and their greater versatility in providing close air support to troops.”

http://z3.invisionfree.com/Defense_Philipp...?showtopic=6601

This post has been edited by kokoronotomo: Jan 11 2012, 08:50 AM
kokoronotomo
post Jan 19 2012, 10:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
interesting fact about Indonesian Minister of Defence, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, a man behind Indonesia's military power up...I thought he's an army general, it turns out he's actually a civilian, a former lecturer and Economics professor at University of Colorado and Secretary General & President of OPEC...surprising consider that TNI has many mafia like generals who might not be uneasy to work with...

But our Zahid doesn't lose to him, got PhD from UPM...smile.gif
kokoronotomo
post Jan 31 2012, 09:41 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
if we buy rafale, indon scare meh... 2nd hand f16 vs brand new rafale? no way! biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by kokoronotomo: Jan 31 2012, 09:41 PM
kokoronotomo
post Sep 2 2012, 08:16 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(zimhibikie @ Sep 2 2012, 03:35 PM)
last year Merdeka Day falls on Raya, so no parade..

2 years ago, parade at Dataran merdeka, got tanks. Even got touch Pendekar tank during their rehearsal...this year, no got. Takut kena tembak ke.. tongue.gif  tongue.gif  tongue.gif
*
2 years ago they wanted to show off to indons, now indons are receiving leopards so no need to show off anymore, malu blush.gif
kokoronotomo
post Nov 2 2012, 10:45 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 1 2012, 09:34 AM)
The pic is of a Rheinmetall's Leopard MBT Revolution. It's an upgrade package by Rheinmetall for the older version Leopard 2A4. Indonesia is buying 63 unit of the Leopard MBT Revolution & 40 unit Leopard 2A4....
*
meanwhile marehsia only has old pendekar which will be crushed easily by those leos... sad.gif
kokoronotomo
post Nov 2 2012, 10:47 AM

New Member
*
Newbie
2 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ Oct 31 2012, 09:30 PM)
user posted image

Google translated:
source
*
really beautiful tanks...I wonder why didn't our gomen buy them instead of ugly pendekars?

Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.1018sec    0.48    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 12:39 PM