Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V7

views
     
kimyee73
post Apr 24 2012, 10:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(corad @ Apr 21 2012, 02:11 AM)
When you are on the front line, being pounded left right and centre while your own clip is empty it certainly would seem so. The resources are there, but not distributed properly.
*
What was potrayed are lack of batteries for NVG and lubricant for AGL. They have plenty of munitions. They also refering to the Army having all the supplies but not USMC.
kimyee73
post Apr 30 2012, 04:18 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(asd5139 @ Apr 30 2012, 12:39 PM)
After watching the battleship movie...I think Malaysia Navy should buy some destroyer ship. Frigate strong enough meh??
*
We don't need destroyer, just get a bigger frigate like 5000 tonnes type. Current one we have is like having a kancil instead of camry.
kimyee73
post May 4 2012, 08:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(yinchet @ May 3 2012, 10:50 PM)

*
ha ha .. i thought Bernama pulled photo from Gempurwira but it was just yinchet handiwork.
kimyee73
post Jun 6 2012, 04:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(cks2k2 @ Jun 6 2012, 01:29 PM)
Eh the belakang is Penang bridge?
*
Berlambak jambatan mcm penang bridge. Standard design of cable-stay bridge.
kimyee73
post Jul 2 2012, 10:04 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


For those who always believe in ATM's quality is better than quantity

QUOTE
U.S. Navy’s Quantity Problem

Sea-service leaders also point out that warships now entering service are far more technologically advanced than the ones they replace.

The message, seemingly, is that quantity no longer has much quality of its own.

Yet there’s an otherworldly feel to such claims. It’s certainly true that each new generation of ships, warplanes, sensors, and weaponry is far more capable in an absolute sense than the generations that went before. True, but not especially meaningful.

One of today’s Arleigh Burke-class Aegis destroyers, for example, would surely outclass an Aegis cruiser from the early 1980s, when that combined radar/fire-control system first went to sea on board USS Ticonderoga.

So what?

In most respects the Ticonderoga (in which I spent two happy months cruising the Baltic Sea in 1989) vastly outmatched its ancestors from Adm. Chester Nimitz’s Pacific Fleet, or from Adm. George Dewey’s flotilla at Manila Bay. Such comparisons tell us little about our prospects in battle today. We build against present-day competitors, not our Cold War, World War II, or Spanish-American War selves.

Combat power is a relative thing, then, not an absolute one. We may be more capable. So are our competitors.

The only standard that matters is how well ships, aircraft, and weaponry perform against today’s adversaries in today’s tactical setting – not on battlegrounds of yore.

History is unkind to sea powers that invent fudge factors – golly-gee technology, tactical mastery, indomitable élan – to explain away numerical shortfalls. The interwar Imperial Japanese Navy had boundless faith in Japanese seafarers’ resolve and tactical virtuosity. Commanders talked themselves into believing that these intangibles would negate superior U.S. Navy numbers. Their navy now litters the bottom of the Pacific – in large part because Rosie the Riveter and her comrades turned out warships and merchantmen like sausages during World War II, overwhelming Japan with insurmountable numbers. Quantity does matter. Let’s not succumb to the sort of thinking that beguiled Tokyo in those fateful years.
source

kimyee73
post Jul 18 2012, 04:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(yinchet @ Jul 17 2012, 11:48 PM)
nope, If we buy it they will sent it over. they will not keep it.
btw such argument is not logical at all.
The only problem we have if getting approval for such weapons.
2nd Y worry on the event of US embargo us? It is very unlikely Malaysia will do something as drastic like the indonesian invasion on timor leste or west puapa.  laugh.gif
*
Not quite true. I recalled this happened before when we bought AMRAAM, they safekeep it in Guam or somewhere, both RSAF and ours. Something about not introducing advanced weapon into the region unless someone else introduce it first. They delivered it only after we bought Su-30MKM with Russian BVR missile. This were discussed before in the old gempurwira forum.
kimyee73
post Sep 26 2012, 02:59 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,007 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
From: island up north


QUOTE(hizperion @ Sep 26 2012, 11:55 AM)
already did but nothing shows up for now
so if anyone got record the show on HD please come share share wink.gif
*
got record in 720p as shown in History HD but no time to edit yet lah..

2 Pages < 1 2
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0472sec    0.84    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 06:22 PM