QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 22 2006, 10:43 PM)
so, wat ur point here?r u sayin' ma system is unstable?
Opteron 939
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 01:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 09:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 12:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Apr 23 2006, 12:51 PM) Erm, don't think so.... Super PI mostly failed due to the instability of RAMs, play around with DRAM Drive Strength and DRAM Data Drive Strength in BIOS enviroment, DRAM Drive Strength will be displayed as Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 & so on. Which is the weakness point?? |
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 01:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 23 2006, 01:01 PM) Which RAM r u using? If BH5 / UTT, u need even numbers (2,4,6,8) err.. im using the Infineon BE-5 chippyIf TCCD, then u need odd numbers (1,3,5,7) The odd numbers are weaker strength, 1 is the weakest and 7 is the near to normal one. Whereas, 2 is the normal one, and 8 is the strongest. So the drive strengths from weak to strong is: 1,3,5,7,2,4,6,8. shall choose even or odd number?? |
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 01:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(charge-n-go @ Apr 23 2006, 01:21 PM) lol, i duno about this. Usually it should be normal drive strength (even numbers). I heard only TCCD likes weak drive strength Maybe u should start working from level 2, and slowly up to 4,6,8 if still not stable Data drive strength should be set to #1 if u have CPC enabled. QUOTE(tAmp0i @ Apr 23 2006, 01:29 PM) I'll go with Drive Strength level 7 (weak4), Data Drive Strength level 3 first before going down to level 2 and auto... thanks guys.. i will try this formula once ive finnish downloading my stuff.currently both setting i put auto onli QUOTE(gsan @ Apr 23 2006, 01:44 PM) this only applied to non-expert board. after upgrading to expert, the setting which i used in ultra-d no longer suitable for expert. well, im still using ultra-d here This post has been edited by gengstapo: Apr 23 2006, 01:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 23 2006, 08:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
hmm.. i think its easier to OC single core rather than dual core opty, IMHO
|
|
|
Apr 28 2006, 05:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
does any1 here try the PCMark05 wif opty here?
i encounter very very weird moment when i tried it |
|
|
May 1 2006, 07:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 3 2006, 08:26 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(arj @ May 3 2006, 04:45 AM) Not exactly. Just dropping by, gonna disappear again soon wahh.. so much to be avoid Here's something I found at XS AVOID if you want to hit 2.8ghz+: CCBWE 0534SPMW CCBWE 0543TPMW CCBWE 0546MPMW CCBWE 0551 (Any packing code) (2.7-2.75ghz 1.55v) CCBWE 0602 (Any packing code) CCBWE 0607 (Any packing code) (2.65ghz 1.55v) http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=96900 btw, mine stepping is not there. hope can touch atleast 2.85Ghz wif better RAMs |
|
|
May 9 2006, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 9 2006, 06:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
which opty OC better, dual or single??
|
|
|
May 11 2006, 08:47 AM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(arj @ May 3 2006, 04:45 AM) Not exactly. Just dropping by, gonna disappear again soon ayarrkk!! last nite cleanin' my XP-90 & onli i realize my opty was CCBWE 0551 UPMW Here's something I found at XS AVOID if you want to hit 2.8ghz+: CCBWE 0534SPMW CCBWE 0543TPMW CCBWE 0546MPMW CCBWE 0551 (Any packing code) (2.7-2.75ghz 1.55v) CCBWE 0602 (Any packing code) CCBWE 0607 (Any packing code) (2.65ghz 1.55v) http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=96900 izzit apply to the dual core oso?? This post has been edited by gengstapo: May 11 2006, 08:50 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 10:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(highland @ May 11 2006, 05:33 PM) forget about the 175,anyway thanl for the advise,coz oledi sold off just bought opteron 170 yesterday from c-zone currently prime is still running at 2.73 without touching the voltage ccbwe 0609 fpaw QUOTE(highland @ May 12 2006, 10:22 AM) actually that opteron bought straight from INTRACO TECHNOLOGY( amd dist) wahh.. nice ehhthey just send to czone for collection so, how far the achievement so far?? |
|
|
May 12 2006, 02:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 11:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 15 2006, 09:07 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(LittleLinnet @ May 15 2006, 12:03 AM) there are quite few thread being posted before owhh.. thanks for the infoSuch as run high vdimm for BH5 and low vcore will kill the proc at long term QUOTE(charge-n-go @ May 15 2006, 12:05 AM) It's been posted b4. I suspect the voltage difference is too big between the RAM and on die mem controller until some reverse voltage breakdown occur (probably?). walao wehh, make me scared to use those BH5 ady btw, it usually happens to BH5 only ler, bcoz other RAM chips operates within JEDEC DDR voltage specification. |
|
|
May 15 2006, 11:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
QUOTE(highland @ May 15 2006, 09:55 AM) [attachmentid=107867]hi there hi there.. may i know wat ur RAMs brand & wat chipset?? just 1st round oc with opty 170 prime is still running just want to ask, is it the temp so high for this speed? what about the voltage? i scared to proceed futher due to the temp thanks |
|
|
May 15 2006, 11:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
|
|
May 16 2006, 01:01 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
10,688 posts Joined: Jan 2005 |
|
| Change to: | 0.0403sec
0.36
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 03:03 AM |