Anywhere else no jam between 7-9am in KLV particularly in Dsara/ LDP / federal highway?

From day 1 the developer already mentioned that the road will be widening to 4 lanes from the existing 2 lanes. This is the vp condition imposed by Mppj before the APDL approved.

Before rustika and tropika were built, the surronding landed properties also cursing tropika/ rustika as it add the traffic volume to entire BSD. It seems that the current development will always beh song the new development next to it.

Which MP?
When was that happened?
I need evidence to double check with the L&G staffs and top management.

Sounds that you (or your friend) have a bad experience against L&G to the extend want to sue them. This explains why u were not happy with this development from your last 8-10 posts in this thread.
I believe they have sold hundred thousands units of houses/Apts in SD itself as being the master developer in this township, and what is the % of their purchasers sue them?

There are few incidents that the DIBS interest is late from some forumers' sharing, but the late interest is taken care of by the developer, what the purchasers worry is their CCRIS records. Human error happens from time to time. As can be seen from their latest financial report, L&G does not has cash flow problem, they were ranked No.7th most cash rich developer in the country, reported by THE EDGE last year.

DF -phase 1 is 95% sold. Not that we are optimistic on this development, it is just that purchasing/investment decision has been made. It is a willing buyer-willing seller transaction. Most forumers appreciate the worries that you have highlighted, but nothing much we can do on the road widening (We have 2 different stories), traffic volumes at the Shell and Caltex U-turn, at this juncture.

My logic is very simple, DF (Phase 1-4) is a 10 years project, and if L&G does not handle the Phase 1 VP good enough (including the lift, water, electric issues that u have highlighted), they will have problems to sell the subsequent phases. It is not a one off project.

My target price as well

My SPA was signed on Jun 2012 (Block A). 42 months construction time means Block A should be VP by Dec 2015.
If the developer deliver in 2016, means got LAD.
All blocks should be Vp at the same time, because all sharing the same common facilities, entrance, car park, swimming pool, gym (which is in between Block B+C).

Luckily under DIBS, otherwise Block A purchasers need to pay longer and higher progressive interest

Yeah same here, i signed in Apr 2012 but only stamped in June 28 2012.

Block A and B launched within the same week/month.
Podium are all shared, The Gym is bridging the Block B and C, so Block C need to be completed before the handover of Block A.

+1
Many flippers want to let go, some might hold for renting it out, plenty of choices, the negotiators can show u 10-20 units in one go.