Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
8 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Nvidia Fan Club V8, Kelab Kipas nVidia Versi Lapan

views
     
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 8 2011, 01:37 PM, updated 12y ago

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


user posted image


Since mod so nice kolos last tered, I open new one

Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA; /ɪnˈvɪdiə/ in-vid-ee-ə) is an American global technology company based in Santa Clara, California. The company invented the graphics processing unit (GPU) in 1999. GPUs drive the computer graphics in games and in applications used by professional designers. Their parallel processing capabilities provide researchers and scientists with the ability to efficiently run high-performance applications, and they are deployed in supercomputing sites around the world. More recently, Nvidia has moved into the mobile computing market, where its processors power phones and tablets, as well as auto infotainment systems. Its competitors include Intel, AMD and Qualcomm.

The following are the most notable product families produced by Nvidia:
[.] GeForce
[.] Quadro
[.] Tegra
[.] Tesla
[.] nForce

Please note that:
- When you ask a question regarding your hardware, please include the hardware's name, your PC spec, and your budget if you want to buy a new GPU
- Do not ask about "card that has xxGB of RAM". A VRAM on a graphic card is only relevant if you are using a display larger than a full HD resolution (1920*1080). A 1~1.5GB of Vram would be enough for every day gaming use
- Stay on topic
- Please post sources (URL) if you want to post a news or a rumour

This post has been edited by DrBlueBox: Dec 6 2011, 09:51 AM
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 9 2011, 12:53 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(jerrylo @ Nov 8 2011, 05:46 PM)
CoD: MW3

use what resolution? aliasing? DX11?
i think all comes down to GPU..
*

Reso 1680x1050, and the GPU is as stated on my sig. All max settings. A pity, since I can get 100FPS easily on Ultra settings in BF3.
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Nov 8 2011, 10:17 PM)
MW3 with GTX580 3SLI @ 2560X1600 Extra
user posted image
*

Kinda shows how bad the port is right? Spitty
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 9 2011, 07:46 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(RegentCid @ Nov 9 2011, 05:42 AM)
This game just release so new....still no proper SLI driver for it yet......Nvidia lately also have to overcome that stupid Driver stop respond shit.
*
DirectX error for me. Also I got that driver stopped working for AMD on my HD5850
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 9 2011, 08:01 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Ulysses @ Nov 9 2011, 07:01 PM)
..u got second pc?  biggrin.gif  best of both world...nvdia n amd
*

I have 4 PCs, created from spare parts whenever I upgrade my pc
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 10 2011, 01:30 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Naraw @ Nov 10 2011, 01:26 AM)
My resolution is 1920 x 1080...
*

You can run fine using medium.
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 10 2011, 09:09 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Vorador @ Nov 10 2011, 09:07 PM)
Yo DAWG, I heard you like aiming down the scope, so I put a scope behind a scope, so you can aim while you aim.

user posted image
user posted image
*
You should post this in the screenshot thread XD
QUOTE(clawhammer @ Nov 10 2011, 05:53 PM)
Yes, you are right smile.gif Most games does not have SLI profile during launch and as far as I know, MW3 does not have one as well (for now). The only game that has a profile during launch was BF3, lol. When we don't have an SLI profile, it means the utilization is not optimal and literally it's like running with a single card even if you have quad SLI. Let's just wait a few weeks for nVidia to come up with a profile.
*

True, but then again this is not a new game engine. Heck some of the errors wrote "Modern Warfare 2" on the title bar instead of "Modern Warfare 3". Couldn't they use the same MW2 profile for it?

This post has been edited by DrBlueBox: Nov 10 2011, 09:11 PM
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 11 2011, 02:56 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(RegentCid @ Nov 11 2011, 12:02 AM)
Nvidia never done a new driver in few week times .....to make this MW3 have SLI....minimum 1 month to 3 month. Plus some more Nvidia another side also need  to settle that unstable stuff....so this new Driver will take long time to release already.....

MW3 SLI ? I bet early of Dec or Jan of 2012 only got SLI driver
*

Oh well that is our lost then sad.gif

In other news
Nvidia: 285.79 Beta (released today)

http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista...eta-driver.html [nvidia.com]
http://www.nvidia.com/object/win7-winvista...eta-driver.html [nvidia.com]
BF3 looks more awesome now
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 14 2011, 10:15 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Demonic Wrath @ Nov 14 2011, 09:12 PM)
Anything above 30FPS is playable gaming. It's agreed by most review websites. Benchmark? Obviously from here we can clearly see that everyone has different perception of playable gaming. For you, it's 60FPS and above.
*

For one I don't agree. A human eye doesnt' see in Hz or FPS. It receives constant stream of light from everywhere. True, it can perceive movement at 25FPS, but smoothness? Try downloading a video in 30FPS and 60FPS and you can instantly see the difference. Thus why for the console MW3 used the 60FPS as it's selling point over BF3. Heck, even Thomas Edison once said that anything below 46FPS is actually damaging to the eyes.

That's why some people spend a lot on hardwares and some even get 120hz monitors. It has a lot of advantages, as with higher FPS on a high refresh rate monitor means you can receive more pictures in a second, and not only you get smoother, more fluid picture, but also your eyes receive information faster. A friend of mine still play FPS on his old 85Hz monitor since it gives him quite a lot of advantages in reaction time

Personally I feel anything below 50FPS is not really fluid and gives me headache, but this differs from person to person, so thus why I usually want a high constant frame rate during gaming.

TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 15 2011, 07:43 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Najmods @ Nov 15 2011, 07:11 AM)
Video and game framerate is NOT comparable. Most video you see is around 30fps, heck most TV's are 24fps, why we perceived its smooth because its constant 24fps all the time, unlike games where it jumps up and down depends on complexity of the scene. That Thomas Edison quote is for silent movies framerate, read the article correctly, the article is dead but I found the quote from it to justify why he says so:

CODE
Controversy over speed dogged silent films from the start. Thomas Edison recommended a speed of 46 frames per second- 'anything less will strain the eye.' As historian Gordon Hendricks wrote in his book "The Edison Motion Picture Myth": 'There would seem to be no good reason for it. This rate was far above any rate necessary for gaining the persistence of vision.' H.A.V. Bulleid points out, however, that Edison's decision was a sensible one: 'To obviate flicker from white light projected on a bright surface requires about 48 obscurations per second.


What matter in game is the consistency of the framerate, if its consistent doing 30fps in game without any drops, that would be great and you won't see lags. If it could do 50fps but also could occasionally drop to below 20fps and jumps up again you will see the lag, you could see this in low-end card mostly, when you enter a place with enormous amount of smoke/fog/shadows area then leave the place.

Those TV you see that use 120Hz in the shop is using high framerate videos to make it looks smoother, if you just plug it into Astro or standard framerate video it won't make it any faster. There is more lag than just framerate in games, go read info about display lag (or input lag) and also pixel response time. If you say your friend 85Hz monitor is a CRT, it have better input lag and pixel response time than LCD so he/she surely have better sync with the game.

If you say eyes don't see framerate and refresh rate why did you bring up games vs. video framerate and adds 120Hz TV with that? A contradicting point no?

If you like 50fps you keep it to yourself, like you pointing out saying it differs from person to person. No need to argue with them.
*

No, I never talked about TV or video. I was pointing out the 120Hz monitors and the PC hardware that could run game with high framerates. Those TV are not even true 120Hz as they are only using 60Hz input and double the output. What I am talking about (and i should have clarified) are true 120Hz monitors (list can be seen here).

If a constant but low framerate is good enough, then why some games "cough"ModernMapPack3"cough" are using 60FPS vs 30FPS as a selling point? Hey, even a constant 24FPS should suffice right?
QUOTE(hevionxxx @ Nov 15 2011, 07:14 AM)
COOL VERY NICE VERY GOOD
*

VERY NICE SPAM! Y U NO GO AWAY?

This post has been edited by DrBlueBox: Nov 15 2011, 07:46 AM
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 22 2011, 09:15 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(saturn85 @ Nov 22 2011, 01:41 AM)
Looking at the reviews I think the EVGA's classified might be better value for money

TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 23 2011, 01:40 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(defaultname365 @ Nov 23 2011, 01:30 PM)
Nice. I had my eye on Leadtek GTX 580 3Gb edition, not many GTX 580 come in 3Gb flavor.  I am hoping the price of the GTX 580 will go down but the price is kinda tight at the moment. Much more value to go from GTX 460 to a GTX 580. Blows my budget out... unless anyone selling their GTX 580.
*
Wait til the GTX 6 series comes out. Prices should go down
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 23 2011, 04:31 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(shinjite @ Nov 23 2011, 04:17 PM)
Mine only 19" 1440x900 but gaming with an overpowered card XD
*
Ppl at pc gamer UK said I was crazy using this rig and gaming only on a lowly 1680*1050 XD
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 23 2011, 06:17 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Hyde`fK @ Nov 23 2011, 05:28 PM)
For you case SLI is such a waste for such resolution. Full HD and higher is the way to go.  brows.gif
*
Friday going to get a 120hz full HD monitor biggrin.gif
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 23 2011, 07:35 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(mhyug @ Nov 23 2011, 07:15 PM)
it went up instead lol.ive been lurking around and seen a bit jump in prices.....
*
Because PC fair is nearing. I expect prices will only go down mid Dec
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 23 2011, 09:23 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(RegentCid @ Nov 23 2011, 09:09 PM)
Samsung 3D monitor?
*

Yep, 23A950D. Read the review here http://wecravegamestoo.com/forums/gadgetry...50d-review.html


TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 25 2011, 10:02 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(kurtkob78 @ Nov 25 2011, 07:42 AM)
buy a monitor with a native res of 1280 x 1024 or 1680 x 1050. so You dont need to have powerful gc to gaming smoothly ...
*

Widescreen is better as it gives you more FOV especially in a shooter or racing game, thus 1280*1024 is out of the window. 1680*1050 is already discontinued with developers preferring 16:9
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 26 2011, 12:17 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(mhyug @ Nov 26 2011, 12:08 AM)
woo 570 meets req.good enough for me kohkoh.
*
Must be said, that is only for High

Anyways

user posted image

TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 26 2011, 01:28 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(mhyug @ Nov 26 2011, 12:29 AM)
good enough for me since i cant go higher then "high"(im on xp) rclxms.gif
*

Ah, then you can't run the game at all since the game does not support that ancient stone age OS
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 27 2011, 12:42 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(munlok30 @ Nov 27 2011, 12:33 AM)
hha -- i guess game created is to make profit -- we need to change a new GPU for the a game if u really wan to play max setting with it =.=!!
*

Not really. Ported shit like NFS The Run can go ultra even on a mid end graphic card. But games like Battlefield 3 is catered for each range of users. You have cheap card? Use low setting (which is the SAME as the one on the XBOX 360 and PS3 version). Have a midrange card? Use Medium. Have a kick ass system? use Ultra/High. If they really want to force you to get a new card, they should just lock everything at High. You don't NEED to use Ultra/High setting to play the game as it's intended to be
TSDrBlueBox
post Nov 27 2011, 02:05 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
789 posts

Joined: Sep 2011


QUOTE(Freedom1104 @ Nov 27 2011, 01:54 AM)
i thought need for speed the run used Frostbite 2???

anyway... beat the game yesterday oredi.... play until this morning 6am... XP XP~
*
Game capped at 30Fps and a decent enough card can run the game on ultra

8 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0503sec    0.41    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th March 2024 - 05:51 PM