QUOTE(xxboxx @ Nov 12 2011, 11:08 AM)
knowing MS, i would say the development for next gen xbox wouldn't be much different that what current developers are doing, only that they have faster processing power and more memory to play with. heck, if really next gen xbox is based of Win 8/9, it would just be a port from PC game.
Not necessarily true. The first gen xbox is based on Pentium 3, while XBox 360 is based on POWER Architecture (pretty similar with PS3, only differs in implementation and graphics). Hence that's why last time there are Mac G5 dev machines floating around (since the machines are previously also run on top of POWER architecture). What I'm implying is that it's pretty uncertain for us to guess its upgrade path. So nope, no one can tell.
Plus, it's more likely that the next gen xbox won't be based on the same OS as their desktop counterpart since that will just cannibalise their console sales. And there's still no prominent rumor on that other than some pure speculation.
QUOTE(xxboxx @ Nov 12 2011, 11:08 AM)
i would say these day companies are getting better at keeping secret. just like Apple manage to keep iphone 4s from leaked out before launch date.
...but that won't work on gaming platform. Other than the console's development time, games development time is pretty long too (taking years). That's the reason why there are leaks on development machines photos. I mean, you can't expect a machine (even the barebone ones) to stay a secret for years while in the hands of developers.
If wanna compare to Apple's veil of secrecy, even iPod Touch 4th Gen is leaked 1 year before it went into market. And for the iPhone 4S, it's just the developers (who got months of early access) previously thought that it's a new machine on a previous gen exterior solely to conceal its identity.
QUOTE(azsace @ Nov 11 2011, 11:02 PM)
actually now not the case.. i notice that newer multiplatform game, ps3 getting better cause game developer now understand how to properly coded the game for ps3 (if games before 2010, yep xbox win)
Not necessarily true. It's just that lots of newer PS3 games requires to put mandatory install (5GB / 8GB / whatever GB of the disc content onto hard disk), while on XBOX it's up to the user to dump the whole disc onto the HDD or either not installing it. Take example of the game Red Dead Redemption (as that's what i personally know), the draw distance is much better on HDD installation than on disc alone, with less texture pop in. That's where you see how some newer xbox games looks not that nice (because of no installation).
It's just that the installation of lots of game is mandatory on PS3, while on XBOX it's purely optional. Graphics-wise, current games look much the same. Plus, it loads much faster on XBox (since it enables full disc copied to the drive), and the installed game looks much nicer on it too.
QUOTE(xxboxx @ Nov 12 2011, 11:08 AM)
if PS3 developer are getting better at properly coded the game, then xbox developer can said to be guru/sifu at coding for xbox. these days most multiplatform games are almost identical in graphic that most people don't even bother to compare it anymore, comparing graphic is so like 2008.
True. they can do so much on the software, but the hardware is much the same like years ago.
This post has been edited by EatMe: Nov 12 2011, 03:02 PM